I'm the same as FrancisAnn... the women in my family (mom's side) all have -at least- single D's, with most doubles or triples.. Mom even had a reduction a bunch of years ago, to get down to a largeC/smallerD, and I can see how she really appreciated getting rid of the back pains.. My sister is pretty large chested too, so after 6mos on herbals, my non-symmetrical B's (left handed, but right boob def faster/larger) I'm hoping will stop at C's. Changing to drug/script-based E within a couple months per therapists/endo, I expect they'll get there pretty quickly.. strange tho, they have not hurt, even when bumped.. just itch... a lot! I am also getting very close to the point where they are sticking out more than enough to notice in thin material/t-shirts.. the uniform shirts I have to wear for work have flap pockets so while it tends to hide a bit more, anything I put in the pockets sticks out, as does the flap itself.. I think I am going to have to switch to compression t-shirts soon

As for actual shape.. I posed this on a couple other forums but no one seems to remember.. for us older girls (late 40's/50's).. Playboy did a really informal study back in the 70's about nose-to-breast shape.. ok, stop yer laughing.. it was true.. the article put up a 100 pictures of girls noses (profile), with 100 pix of their breasts (also profile) and nearly 70% were the same or very, very close. Think back.. all the women you know, or look at now, look at their nose profile, then look at their chest profile.. for those girls here that have ample or significant growth,.. look at your nose profile, then.. well, you get the idea..

I have searched and searched for that Playboy article, but sadly, can not find anything.. and searching for it in Google/Bing/Yahoo only brings up links to Tanner pages.. *sigh*

Anyway, a few moments distraction.. but look around... you'll see it in real life..