I don't decribe you as a ->-bleeped-<- specially not because your having the emotional part into consideration and just being openminded in general.
But I don't see the big ->-bleeped-<- taboo.
first as simon says not everyone who got interesting in transgenders are bad people, so I feel the stigma need to stop. theres many people who like transgenders like many transgender likes cisgenders, that should be okay.
for me it isn't really just black or white?
I prefern pre up transguys over cisguys, I think black women are hot more often than I think white women are, and I think people wearing Hijab are beutiful.
its not like I nessesarry jump everyone in those categories but having it as a + or part of my attraction dose that make me a ->-bleeped-<-?
is a gay man who only is attracted to guys less than 30 a chaiser? a man who log in
farm-wife.com for that seach a chaiser? is a hetrosexual man who only likes skinny girls a chaiser?
---
maybe..? I am unsure the diffrence of sexual preference and chaiser, I belive it lays in the word or the meaning,
For me a chaiser isnt nessesarry bad but it depend on the concent/agrement between the people.
deep down its how the person threat you and how you want to be threated back who matter.
