Thank you, that makes it all much more clear

.
Quote from: SoupSarah on July 28, 2018, 12:19:16 AM
But to put it into context, if you were facing major surgery and there was a slight chance that taking a pill for a few months could actually negate the need for surgery, would it not be ethical for your doctors to at least try the pill first?
Depends on the context... has my doctor noticed other symptoms that make him believe that the pill will not only work, but that the surgery wouldn't actually help at all? Or is he just making me take the pill because he requires everyone to take the pill first?
What I want to avoid is having my therapist treat my gender dysphoria with treatments for DID by
default, simply on the basis that I have gender dysphoria, or have started to take an active interest in feminine things. That just sounds like the therapist is pathologizing my habit of buying women's clothing to try on, which is the kind of thing that conversion therapy advocates do; slapping people in the face for harmless cross-gender activities and discouraging them from doing them. If the therapist is instead looking for
additional symptoms of DID besides just gender dysphoria, and has found them, then yes, treating someone for DID instead of assuming that transition is the best solution would be the way to go. It certainly sounds like you fit the bill yourself, and have an assortment of symptoms that aren't common to ->-bleeped-<- alone.
As for how easy it is to receive recognition and treatment for being transgender... well, I'm sure it's easier than being diagnosed with DID, but I've personally had the hardest time getting mental health help for even the simplest, most obvious mental illnesses or conditions, and for the silliest, most easily avoidable reasons. Like I said, I had two different therapists refuse to treat my depression just because my stressors were religion-based. I had another one tell me I probably had an autism-spectrum disorder, even though she said in the same breath that she was not qualified to give such a diagnosis, and had not ran me through any official tests to detect such a thing, but that I didn't need one because her personal assessment was good enough. I had a different one who dumped me after two sessions and canceled our next scheduled session saying she wasn't able to help me, but didn't say why, and didn't offer me a referral. I had another one who strongly believed I was transgender based on what I told her (which I now believe I am), but was so pushy about it at a time when I was suffering from extreme anxiety that I got fed up with it and refused to further consider that I was transgender at the time, which set me back months of personal development while I was actively trying to explore my issues and get treatment for them. If she hadn't been so hell-bent on suggesting that gender dysphoria was the cause of
all my problems and I needed to transition as the
first line of defense against
all of them, instead of letting me figure things out for myself, I would've had an easier time accepting everything. Additionally, I know plenty of anti-LGBT religious people who would love to have an excuse to label all transgender people as mentally ill and remove their access to transitional care, which is why it is
very important that distinctions are clearly made between the small number of cases where gender dysphoria is a symptom of mental illness which can be solved through non-transitional means and transition might be detrimental to the patient, and the majority of cases where it
is best solved through transition. If this is not made clear, we get people like Walt Heyer ruining things for everybody.
So just to make it clear, making vague claims about how gender dysphoria can be caused by a mental illness and be treated without transition is the sort of badgering that transgender people get all the time, and they are naturally going to be disinclined to be receptive to it. Making even a small amount of clarification goes a long way toward eliminating that, which you have done and Virginia has not. I'm not
trying to be antagonistic and I certainly did not start this discussion with anything other than simple curiosity, but I've gotten frustrated with the lack of simple answers to my simple questions, and getting vaguely insulting replies that don't address my concerns instead, combined with statistics that don't actually support the writer's point.