Mazda says zoom zoom, Devlyn says boom boom!
LOL

Hehe Sigyn you know what's up. Nice to see you've landed somewhere comfortably.
Cool Meta

. I like farmwork

.
& yeah those days are over, i've tried all companies in and around my area.
On the subject of Chemistry, i've taught myself mostly, kinda read Vogels handbook for fun. Now I just challenge myself on Bluelight in some experimental discussion revolving possible pathways & pharmacology of chemicals yet to be known. It's sufficient.
I'd prefer to go into research but...
-Negative results are not noted.
-How many excerpts i've read where the researchers did not say anything about the raw data.
-If you don't pay, you don't publish. That's so backwards that it weeds out the majority of "genuine" people.
-Three publishing companies (Reed Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, and Springer) account for 42 percent of all published articles. This oligopoly has obscenely high profit margins of 30 to 40 percent. That's higher than most of the biggest companies in the world except Pfizer.
-You can't share your work without losing it. When scientists can't get papers from their peers, they have to rely on subscriptions owned by their employer.
Predatory publishers are corrupting open access...
So it's sorta like "I want to cure illnesses but i'll end up in a soapfactory"
Getting a grant a la Shulgin, those days are long past too but with the recent uproar of MAPS it certainly is motivating.
Maybe if I win the lottery someday