Quote from: warlockmaker on March 17, 2016, 10:33:46 AM
They all use a form of penile inversion... that's their marketing gimmick.. I have seen their results personally and PAI, Suporn and Chettawut are all similar. I will challenge anyone that says otherwise ....I have seen the results visually on post op girls done by all three ..
Here its written what Suporn uses for what:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suporn_Watanyusakul"Dr. Suporn's method differs from most MTF SRS in that he does not use the penile inversion method. He instead constructs the vaginal canal with scrotal skin and uses the penile tissues for the labia, clitoris, and other external features. A full thickness inguinal (groin crease) skin graft is used for the vaginal lining in cases where inadequate scrotal skin is available."
Basically with a very basic penile inversion there might be a bit of a stretched look to the area above the vulva ..
which might not matter much, there is also a lot of variation in cis girls ...
Well visually its another matter.
Its all supposed to look like a certain outcome

But there are differences for surgeons imo ...
thai surgeons tend to produce more generous labia ...
north amer. surgeons more a tidy labia look ...
thats why imo asking some people for outcomes of the finnish surgeon might be of advantage ...
*hugs*