Quote from: Rachael on November 06, 2007, 08:47:56 PM
Kate: hormone therapy has a more significant effect on younger patients... according to the new british SOC. the following are listed:
greater likelihood of tanner V breast growth.
if under 24, increased likelihood of minor bone structure change.
Facial hair and vocal change reversal (ive had this)
earlier cessation of androgens is likely to reduce the 'damage' to the body
higher levels of human growth hormone present in the under 24s also is a factor.
I am not saying hrt is non functional in older transitioners, it isnt...
nor am i saying that all 20 somethings are 100% passable babes, while the 40+ lot are men in dresses, this isnt the case.
But as someone who was pre hrt, completely unpassable, to someone who is fairly happy with her appearance now. i have yet to see the level of change in an older transitioner, compared with a young transitioner.
R 
if this is really possible and true than you really made my day...

i am 20 and will be starting hormones in near future... finally

i have noticed that all "official" researches indicate that only fat redistribution, some berast tissue growth, and somewhat body hair reduction is induced by hormones
Yet on the other hand there are (usually those "less than a decade past puberty") girls claimind wonderful changes not credited elswhere:
softening of the voice, shrinking in height by few inches, shrinking of feet by size or two, very noticable facial hair reduction....
an i think it was about time that these cahnges are officialy recognised because it can't be that so many people is making these stuff up
not that i am saying anything radical can happen with bones; but i believe that it is likely to lose inch or two in height or wear a bit smaller shoes....
what do u think about this? has it happened to any of you?