good idea with the new thread, i always thought i was saying things that were agreed, seems i was very wrong. genderqueer part gladly rescinded, but talks still to be had.
Posted on: November 12, 2007, 11:24:51 PM
But to end my thoughts on this discussion...
I think one of the big problems Kaimialana has with what I have said is my use of assumption.
Assumption is one of the best intellectual tools there are, and it is the one I use the most. It can learn a whole complicated system quickly, it can speed all learning by a long way. It is often correct, and when not correct it often provides a useful model. If it weren't for assumption there would be no knowledge base, because all knowledge was assumed at some point. There would be no hypothesis, there would be no theories.
The only thing with assumption is that it can't argue. Not that it can't back up facts (many argumentative positions can't) but that it can't be close-minded enough to say, 'I am right.' Assumption is incredibly open minded, it says, 'I don't know for sure but...' Assumption is always ready to change it's minds when new data is added.
If you read my comments I have said things like, 'I have thought' 'I always felt', these are assumptions challenged by what you have said and changing. This is the sign of an incredibly open mind, and any suggestion that my mind is closed is a dumb one. I was on the process of re-accessing my information, I was describing what I had thought, how I had started, To be appalled at my close mindedness is just a misunderstanding, and I quick and sudden decision at that.
As for androgyne/genderqueer, I will try and explain the model I had created in the other thread.