Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Brother Micah not covered by first amendment

Started by Shana A, March 12, 2008, 06:59:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Brother Micah not covered by first amendment
Letter to the Editor
Justin R. Crumpton
Issue date: 3/12/08

http://media.www.cw.ua.edu/media/storage/paper959/news/2008/03/12/Opinion/Brother.Micah.Not.Covered.By.First.Amendment-3263958.shtml

On March 7, I visited the campus of the University and had lunch with a friend. My friend, who I will not name, is currently a freshman at Alabama and in the honors program. After finishing lunch at one of the dining facilities in the Ferguson Center, we walked outside to the area between the Ferg and the Student Services Center.

What I then encountered, as a visitor to the University's main campus, was shocking and appalling.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

mickiejr1815

this incident should have been reported by every female that was harassed. in all reality this is sexual harassment. i wouldn't have tolerated it, if he had called me or one of my friends a whore. i would have knocked him on his ass with purse. that was blatant disrespect from this Micah. he is no brother to anyone, just someone who probably needs therapy and something better to do than harass the female student body at this school. i'm appalled by his actions and the schools NON-reaction.



>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Mickie
  •