Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Most strangest thing you've ever packed with?

Started by kestin, July 29, 2008, 02:50:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kestin

Just a random question I thought of. I don't often pack and I don't have a proper 'packy' yet, so I usually use a sock or something if I do XD However, my 'strangest' thing would now have to be a rainbow coloured hacky-sack that has a big heart on the front with a smiley face.

lol

It worked quite well, never moved around much cause of the weight and looked rather realistic within the confines of my jocks.

  •  

sneakersjay

Rolls of cloth from the rag bag held together with Scotch tape.  It was as anatomically correct as I could get it, meaning shaft and balls.  I was 9, what can I say??  LOL

Jay


  •  

Mister

  •  

noxdraconis

Once I used one of those koosh balls.  The projections (those wierd stringy things that make it seem like it is covered in some kind of hair) stuck out from the sides of my underwear and it looked like I dyed my pubes rainbow, not that I had any at that tender age.


  •  

kestin

  •  

Elwood

Meh. I used toilet paper when I was younger. I use a sock now. I don't imagine I'll use a packer any time soon.
  •  

Mister

Quote from: Elwood on July 29, 2008, 03:22:53 PM
Meh. I used toilet paper when I was younger. I use a sock now. I don't imagine I'll use a packer any time soon.

Because a $12 packer is cost prohibitive? 99% of the time, no one knows your packing.  The exception is/are the person/people you allow to actually feel your crotch.
  •  

Osiris

I also used toilet paper when I was little and of course the classic socks. :P
अगणित रूप अनुप अपारा | निर्गुण सांगुन स्वरप तुम्हारा || नहिं कछु भेद वेद अस भासत | भक्तन से नहिं अन्तर रखत
  •  

Elwood

Quote from: Mister on July 29, 2008, 04:57:31 PM
Quote from: Elwood on July 29, 2008, 03:22:53 PMMeh. I used toilet paper when I was younger. I use a sock now. I don't imagine I'll use a packer any time soon.

Because a $12 packer is cost prohibitive? 99% of the time, no one knows your packing.  The exception is/are the person/people you allow to actually feel your crotch.
No.

Because I'm afraid it will move around and such. I'd like to actually see one of these in my hands, think about how it's going to work etc. before I buy one, possibly ending up getting rid of it. And actually, yes, $12 is a lot of money when you have no income.

I already do pack. I don't see a major difference between a sock and a packer if no one's going to be touching it.
  •  

Dennis

A guinea pig, but it moved around too much ;)

Dennis
  •  

Nero

Quote from: Dennis on July 29, 2008, 05:33:39 PM
A guinea pig, but it moved around too much ;)

Dennis

I just spit my drink out, thanks. Tell me you're joking, Den.  :laugh:
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Elwood

I'd never willingly stick an animal in my pants. I've had a mouse crawl into my pant leg and that was the end of it. I didn't freak, since I saw it coming, but did it feel weird.
  •  

Dennis

Quote from: Nero on July 29, 2008, 05:58:35 PM
Quote from: Dennis on July 29, 2008, 05:33:39 PM
A guinea pig, but it moved around too much ;)

Dennis

I just spit my drink out, thanks. Tell me you're joking, Den.  :laugh:

Yeah, a little. Elwood's comment made that pop into my head.

Dennis
  •  

Purple Pimp

Weirdest?  A glasses case, I think.  On my old Rocky Horror cast, I would occasionally play Rocky and needed to "bulk up" for the role, as it were.

Lia
First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you would do. -- Epictetus
  •  

sneakersjay

Quote from: Elwood on July 29, 2008, 05:01:30 PM
I already do pack. I don't see a major difference between a sock and a packer if no one's going to be touching it.

Very true.  I'm the only one who touches it (in private, of course!!) and I'm anal about the fact that it has to FEEL REAL.  So a sock won't cut it for me.  The $12 packys are the best packers I've found so far as far as texture/feel goes, esp. for the price.  Warm and powdered (cornstarch) they feel like real skin and the real deal.  The 3.5" doesn't move in tighty whities; I don't think that one has moved even in looser briefs or boxer briefs.  The 5.5" has flimsy balls and does tend to move if your shorts are loose.

Probably TMI but I wish I had that much info before I spent way too much on packers I'll never use.

Jay


  •  

Elwood

So you've felt a real penis for comparison? I ask merely for information.

Since I don't touch my crotch on a regular basis, I don't really see a need for it to feel real. At least not yet. Sure, when transition starts, then I'll invest in a nicer pack. Until then, I really don't have a need.

Also, I don't want it to be "pasted" to me, which is what it sounds like most people do. So I don't think it will work for me. I want something that sits in there, doesn't stretch the hell out of my underwear, and isn't sticky or "cornstarched" to my body. I particularly don't want any food in my pants.

Now, I don't mind natural movement. What I mind is things like it switching positions, crawling up my thigh, or worse, falling out of my pants.
  •  

sneakersjay

Quote from: Elwood on July 29, 2008, 07:03:13 PM
So you've felt a real penis for comparison? I ask merely for information.

Yes, I was married to a bio-male for 15 years.



QuoteAlso, I don't want it to be "pasted" to me, which is what it sounds like most people do. So I don't think it will work for me. I want something that sits in there, doesn't stretch the hell out of my underwear, and isn't sticky or "cornstarched" to my body. I particularly don't want any food in my pants.


It just sits there.  The powder or cornstarch (of which most powders are made out of) just absorbs moisture.  Lots of packys are kind of sticky/tacky after you wash them.  The powder makes them smooth and soft.  The smaller packers don't stretch your underwear; just create a realistic bulge.  That underwear bulge is usually not visible when you're wearing pants.  Some packers can be adhered, but those are the expensive prosthetics and not the cheapy packers we're talking about here.

Jay


  •  

Elwood

Quote from: sneakersjay on July 29, 2008, 07:20:41 PM
QuoteAlso, I don't want it to be "pasted" to me, which is what it sounds like most people do. So I don't think it will work for me. I want something that sits in there, doesn't stretch the hell out of my underwear, and isn't sticky or "cornstarched" to my body. I particularly don't want any food in my pants.
It just sits there.  The powder or cornstarch (of which most powders are made out of) just absorbs moisture.  Lots of packys are kind of sticky/tacky after you wash them.  The powder makes them smooth and soft.  The smaller packers don't stretch your underwear; just create a realistic bulge.  That underwear bulge is usually not visible when you're wearing pants.  Some packers can be adhered, but those are the expensive prosthetics and not the cheapy packers we're talking about here.

Jay
So then it isn't attached, or if it is attached, is attached well.
  •  

sneakersjay

The cheapy packers just stay put by pressure of your shorts; they are not attached at all.  I'm talking about the cheapy $12 packers.  They don't adhere.  They sit there, wedged in, like your socks do.

The expensive prosthetics use a medical adhesive to adhere them.

Jay


  •  

Elwood

But... I don't wear tight shorts. @_@;

Ah, but I wedge my sock at a weird angle. I'm just not sure if this would work.
  •