maybe I just haven't explained well enough. let me try again.
I'll put it this way...
if people dropped the pink and blue, dresses and "boy clothes" (with all kinds of sports motifs etc), and dressed all of their children neutral, it would have to mean that they have all learned/accepted that things (gender, at least) aren't always what they appear. it would mean that people (in cultures where it is an issue) have accepted transsexuality as a part of reality. you don't think that would be a good thing?
another thing is, I'm pre-T. after I fully transition, what if I wanted to show someone pictures of me as a baby/toddler, or someone happens upon them? I'd have to explain, because the person would probably be thinking wtf, why did his mom dress her little boy like a girl? this would not be an issue if we all dressed children in neutral clothing, until they are old enough to decide what gender they are/what they like to wear.
I think it would be nice if I had some pictures of me as a child in which I'm not in stereotypical girl clothes and haircuts. it makes me sad to look at them, that I was assumed to be a girl and raised and dressed as one. it doesn't SEEM to be a big deal, and no, it didn't really hurt me, and it's not that I'm so bothered that I was adorned in pink as a baby. I had no idea. no, it didn't hurt me, it couldn't have, and I can dress as I please now (ironically, I like to crossdress) but this is NOT THE POINT! the thing that bothers me is IGNORANCE and DISREGARD of transsexuality! do you see what I mean now? and do you still disagree?