Quote from: Nero on August 05, 2009, 02:46:36 PM
[...]
It's not what one would expect to see and it may not fit comfortable visual norms, but then so do a lot of things. It's distressing to try not to look away when speaking to a horribly disfigured person or not to cringe at a mentally handicapped person drooling.
Indeed. Should the other party be required to hold your gaze? Or should you accept that although your condition isn't your fault, it isn't theirs either - and so not take offense at a natural and (usually) barely conscious reaction?
Nobody makes a deliberated "I won't look at this person!" decision, it's almost a visceral reflex which is why, as you said, you almost have to force yourself not to do it.
If you happen to be musical, you may notice how discordance, while not *physically* uncomfortable, causes a definite sensory tension that just doesn't "feel" right...it's almost a palpable relief when it stops (or falls into tune). Similarly, when presented with a gender/appearance incongruity, there's a corresponding sensory dissonance.
(It may be precisely this that "drag queen" entertainment leverages, in a variation of the way that laughter is theorized to be a "release" of anticipation or tension from the unexpected or uncomfortable...but that's a digression).
If someone who is clearly not physically
x demands to be treated or addressed as
x, there will be a cognitive dissonance in the other party because there's a mismatch between sensory input and previously learned (and oft reinforced) norms. As our stereotypical sci-fi robots might say... "does not compute!"
It's perfectly natural for a cisgendered 3rd party to use pronouns that are aligned with what they perceive, which is going to be the physical appearance. A trans-person can certainly request the use of pronouns appropriate to their mental gender identity - but most cis folks will have to consciously concentrate to use the right pronoun, in exactly the same way as one has to "force" yourself not to look away (or, ironically, excessively stare) at a disfigurement.
Honestly, I am so grateful for the gender icons because on several occasions I have had to consciously make an effort to double-check I use the right pronoun because some individual's features and presentation don't align in their avatar. And that's me, here, learning about this community...and I still have to nudge myself to get it right.
Your average cis in the street, as unaware as I was before I joined here, has got almost no chance of avoiding this very sensitive faux pas.
And that's the rub...because while we've been writing about "requests" to use the "correct" pronoun, I'm pretty sure that these requests are often more of a prickly demand (based on a pretty consistent tone in some quarters during my tenure here).
Now - I understand why...but only because I'm here. I also understand that a cis person is never going to experience the acute dysphoria a trans-person can. Nevertheless, by asking a cis-person to use pronouns in contrary to appearance, one is really asking them to maintain a mental gender representation of oneself that is incongruous ... and that's simply why I described it as "dysphoria by proxy".