I'm not particularly fond of being misrepresented. I'm cycling progesterone and spent about 45 minutes typing something very, very bitchy last night but I'm in a much better mood.
Shelina has had horrific experiences with straight men. After 14 of them, obviously she's doing something wrong. That might be in the way she goes about relationships, or who she's choosing to date. I mean no offense, but 14 beatings is probably a record.
My suggestion of dating bi men isn't foolproof. Bi people are NOT pansexual. There's no guarantee that just because someone is bi they'll want a trans person. However, bi people who have some experience can relate to being used sexually (or using sexually, as it may be) and are generally more comfortable with non-binary situations. It may be some sexual fantasy. It may be some chasing. But this is why I said that I'd prefer to have shallow sex and not be beaten.
I'm really offended that my suggestion to try bi guys is construed as being an attack on the female status of MTF, considering I'm on hormones myself and pursuing part time RLE right now. Further, taking the leap of logic that "Date bi men" which implies they're more open minded, obviously, since they like both sexualities to a degree, translates to "you have to be homosexual to date a transwoman" bothers me.
News flash, gay men hate breasts and jiggly girl asses. They don't like the way girls smell and don't like girly things. (This assumes that, since most "straight" MTF are, well, "straight", you'd be dating a masculine gay man, not a queen.) I'm clearly not suggesting a mtf to date gay men. It's just rude as all hell to condemn bi men as closet homosexuals and to put words in my mouth. It's more offensive than your suggestion that I was disparaging MTF, because society is already so cruel to bi men.
Further it feels like there's an allegation that being bi or homosexual is somehow a bad thing and that suggesting such a thing about a man is horrible. That's way too mainstream of thought for this website.
Can we just be realistic adults and admit that 'straight' 'bi' 'gay' are pretty much meaningless labels when dealing with transsexuals' partners? People are going to call you and your boyfriend ->-bleeped-<-gots even post-op if they're closed minded idiots, and the other side of the spectrum will call you straight even if you're pre-HRT and beard removal as long as you identify female.
There's a grey area where we express both sexual characteristics and it's just ridiculous to expect the average person to accept us entirely when you're sporting an A cup that's covered in black hair. Some people can deal with it, other people are just simply not attracted to things. Now later on when one presents more female (or male), things are different.
It's like saying that a transitioned FTM, since genital surgery is off the table for most, can date straight men because they have a vagina. Straight men don't want a big hairy muscular dude even if he has a vagina. Gay men don't want a girl with female sexual characteristics even if she has a (probably non functional) penis.
Relationships are way, way too complex to blanket.
Personally, when I was a boy, I was bothered that the really pretty, girly girls didn't give me the time of day. They'd openly make comments about never dating short men in my presence and it doesn't matter what I would have tried to do, they wouldn't have been interested. I think that's an analogy to "extreme" straight guys who could never accept a transwoman. Why pursue people who are not interested in you? If you have an unrealistic fantasy, change the fantasy.