Quote from: tekla on December 27, 2009, 12:07:05 PM
I was under the impression that not all love was chemically related
Well, its more correctly electro-chemical in nature.
Love is, of course, a subjective issue. Science can't deal with subjective issues and for a long time, credable scientists didn't try.
In recent years, many have sought to do so but their work demonstrated that they are really quacks posing a scientists.
The issue of love is a good case in point.
There are, undoubtedly, many electro/chemical/biological features associated with love. Some scientists have tried to suggest that these cause love and the feelings we experience are an illusion created by these features.
However, this argument is flawed, to the point of derision for a number of reason.
1. There is no consistancy between different humans in exhibiting these features. Either in the nature of the features or their intensity.
2. These features can be exibited by people not experiencing love. QED.
3. Most emotions result in electro/chemical/biological changes, but the emotions come first. There is a group of illnesses which are associated with emotional state. Most gastrointestinal disorders for example.
(The nature of disease is cause and predisposition, except in the case of this group of diseases, where their needs to be cause, predisposition and emotion).
Stomach ulcers are associated with anger, especially frustrated anger.
Using the reasoning of those who argue that love is electro/chemical/biological, the stomach ulcer causes anger.
Yet numerous studies have concluded that those prone to frustrated anger frequently develop stomach ulcers where these didn't exist. So, the anger comes first.
This is clear indication that emotion can and does cause electro/chemical/biological changes to occur.