If you can point out any conceivable theory under which I violated the TOS before or after edit......do it. But I do expect you explain that theory, here, in public view. I did not violate the TOS simply by objecting to an insult directed at an entire trans group, those women who's bodies have been corrected to reflect their neurology. I did "get" the "joke" which failed on multiple levels. "Jack off" specifically refers to male masturbation, the similarity to moving a jack handle up and down. In all my long years of being exposed to sexist remarks I never ran across "jack" used to refer to a penis....so the "joke" is an epic fail that the poster realized was an insult via the "explanation" included with it. It not only was not funny, it was insulting. I kept my comment to that only adding that I doubted the jokester would understand why it was offensive. If this violated the TOS I demand that 3/4 of the posting on this entire board be removed on the same basis as I have suffered far far worse here multiple times without response from the board censors.
I will not apologize for having been insulted personally when I had not done so myself, did not respond to the attack and followed the exact procedure I had been told many times in the past to take. To wit: don't respond, report.
Your neo-gynophobic double standard is showing big time. As a child I learned that standing up to abuse or bullying meant I would be punished for doing so. This is exactly why I am a major supporter of anti-bullying laws for schools. This is no different. I did not address any of the myriad issues I have with this board's editorial policies, I simply indicated this was an insult to an entire group this board insists is part of the "trans communities" and therefore is an actual and real violation of the TOS which is self evident if one isn't blinded by bigotry towards women of history.
Given past experience here I know this will be removed and I most likely will be banned. You will simply prove my point in doing so.
