Quote from: K8 on April 07, 2010, 06:24:52 PM
OK. I didn't express myself well. 
There are physical differences between males and females. There are usually hormonal differences, too, which in turn create more physical differences. I think that the combination of those physical differences and hormonal differences affect how people, on average, think and act. We see this in the differences in male and female behaviour that transcend culture.
So, if you have the physical nature of one sex and the mind and soul of another – what we often refer to as gender – you are at odds with yourself. My body and hormones were male, but my mind and soul – my gender identity – were female. So, was I male or female? The short answer is "yes".
To make it easier to make sense of it, I thought of myself as male (body) but not a man (not male in my mind and soul). I don't think this would be different in another social structure. Or, more strictly, it would be different but still present. Therefore, to me being tansgendered is not a social construct or a failure to fit into a social construct but is inherent in my nature of having a male body and a female essence.
Or have I just muddied it more and should now just shut up? 
- Kate
I'm with you on this, Kate ... Of course there are exceptions to any and every generalization, but it seems to be pretty evident that all sorts of aspects of female and male behaviour match that physical/genital model of the man imposing and the woman receiving ...
For example, to take my own professional field in the media ... if you look at women's magazines, which are written by and for women, they are incredibly inwardly directed. The overwhelming emphasis is on the reader and her emotional, sensual, aesthetic experiences ... her beauty routine, diet, clothes, relationships ... and huge attention is paid to her feelings in every one of these contexts. Stars are constantly held up as examples to emulate by (as it were) bringing her into your life and yourself ... buy a handbag like this actress; go on a diet like this model; bring up your children as brilliantly as this singer, etc.
Men's publications, on the other hand, are much more outgoing, assertive, active ... No man's magazine ever suggests that its readers should copy a top entrepreneur's suit, or get their hair done like a world champion athlete .. these men are held up as examples of external achievement ... and there are lots of stories about money and how to make it, girls who'd be great to screw, sports, outdoor activities ... etc, etc.
This is a massively controversial field, for all sorts of political and scientific reasons ... but if you look at the ways in which we are rewarded by our nervous/hormonal systems, women get a rush of warm, cozy, affiliative oxytocin if they pick up a baby, or even see another woman's baby pics. Men get a massive adrenalin and testosterone boost from being on a winning sports team.
This leads me to wonder if we can ever claim to truly be women as long as we have male bodies, which still respond on a primal, physical level in male ways. The test - as you have clearly discovered, to judge from your many fascinating posts - is what happens during and after transition.
If HRT and SRS give one a feeling of wholeness, contentment and truth, then clearly one is a woman and was always meant to be one. But if they do not, then perhaps it was just a fantasy, or a desire that had no basis in reality.
I cannot honestly say right now: yes I am a woman. But i can say that all my life I have felt profoundly ill-at-ease with my male existence and absolutely certain that I would be happier if I could present myself to the world in female form ... and that's enough to be going on with!