Quote from: Writer Guy on February 25, 2011, 07:00:15 AM
Could you explain that a little more, because I guess I am having difficulty understanding what you are saying.
As I said before, that's why I am even posting here, I want to get this right and have accurate information to work with.
Thank you!
Guy:
Here is a graph about the spectrum of diversity in regards to gender and sex:

I've used graphs similar to this in my introductory workshops about being transsexual.
There are four general components to a persons gender and all of them are a spectrum or a range.
As Lord Kat mentioned sexual orientation and gender identity are two separate parts.
The top range represents the characteristics of the genitalia. And is usually assigned at the moment of birth.
The second range is a persons internal feelings of gender, how they feel within themselves whether they are male or female, regardless of the configuration of their external genitalia.
The third range is a persons social presentation of gender. This is more related to how they prefer to dress and present themselves to society.
And the fourth range is sexual orientation. This represents what gender they are attracted to.
Now if you draw a straight line down the left hand side of all the ranges, you have a person who was born with unambiguous female genitalia, has an internal feeling of being female, makes a social presentation of female, and is attracted to males. That would be the classic definition of a straight woman. And if you draw a line down the right side you have a classically straight male.
Transsexuals are people whose internal sense of gender is opposite of their genitalia. If a person is born with female genitalia but have an internal sense of being male, they would be generally defined as "female to male" transsexual, or ftm. And opposite of that would be a person with male genitalia but an internal sense of being female. These would be "male to female" transsexuals or mtf.
Note that neither of these ranges have anything to do with a persons sexual orientation. A ftm could be romantically attracted to either males or females, or somewhere in between.
That is why trying to assign labels like gay or straight to transsexuals is meaningless. We could be considered simultaneously gay AND straight.
By trying to clarify the situation, I'm afraid I may have muddied the waters instead. This is a very complex issue and may be difficult to frame within a story or graphic novel. And a simple Punnett square really does not represent the true nature of things as they are. Even if you were to expand it to encompass all the variables, the implication is that these are binary values, and they are not. For example, a person could be attracted to both males and females, a bisexual, and would not have a meaningful representation on the square.
Now you, of course, as author, are free to make any generalities you wish within the frame of your story. And the whole point of story telling is to tell a story and not necessarily get bogged down in details. You mentioned that the subject of your story is a person who is contemporary to the current time who is transported in time to the future and observes a society that has three general genders and then the effects that such a society would have as viewed through the eyes of your subject. That may make for a good read, but, oversimplification could make it less acceptable to people such as ourselves.
Both Spider Robinson and Ursula LeGuinn have written novels that have a fluid gender as a major component of the society and are interesting reads as well. They both grappled with the complex issues regarding gender, sexuality, and attraction. They both came at it from different angles and produced surprisingly good stories.
I wish you the best of luck in your story. I'd really like to see it when it is completed. Feel free to ask any questions you may have.
-Sandy