" I don't think your question makes any sense. "That person looks like a man. That person is wearing a dress. That's a man in a dress." Of course they would adopt that on their own. For a 6-10 year old child, that would be the obvious thing to say. They don't know how to think abstractly yet. To them, everything is concrete."
You are of course welcome to your own opinion. But I reiterate that most children do NOT know how to look outside of the box unless they are taught. Child see's a person that looks masculine, i.e. butch. Person is "correcty" attired for her gender role. Child makes observation, that woman looks like a man. ha, ha, ha! Children are cruel. But it a greater leap for that child to concur that that person is not a masculine looking woman, but is instead a man dressing as a woman. Or, "man in a dress." Popular culture has made that phrase available, and kids adopt it readily like all other stuff in the media or on-line.
There have always been women that appeared more masculine than feminine, and men that are the opposite. Children pick up on cues of behaviour, but the conclusions they draw, or the language they use is coached in popular culture. That IMHO.
QuoteI'm sure we can borrow from the homosexual agenda.
We have a copyright! Be careful!
The biggest difference is that most homosexuals, in this day and age, don't wish to live in stealth. That is why it's called being OUT.
