Nicolette : Yes, I was circumcised and got 5.5" of depth, and I don't think he used the whole glans - I believe he removes a small portion (with the total nerves for the whole glans attached) and repositions it to form a clitoris. Not 100% sure on that, but I *am* quite sure what I've got now is far, far smaller than the original glans!
If he uses the rest of the glans skin internally, it wasn't mentioned but would make sense. He did explain that he also removes the bit of perineum where the vagina will go as a whole square of skin early on, and uses that as a "skin graft" (otherwise it would be discarded). Oh, and he uses the urethra from inside the penis as mucosal tissue to line the inner labia and clitoral hood, which means that in my case - where it seems to have turned out as well as could be hoped - I now have moist, light pink, mucosal skin there just as in a natal vulva.
Also, yes, I actually showed up at the hospital the night before; the morning of the operation, I got examined, was told I had enough material, and went into surgery a few minutes later. I know his materials say you have to go for a pre-op consult months before, but as far as I can tell that packet is wrong about half of the details and then they're not as strict about the other half as it sounds. I was pretty surprised, but pleased, that I only needed to make the one trip to Montreal.
(Once again, no reason to think other surgeons aren't as good.

I'm answering questions b/c this technique/experience is what I know and I want to help you out, not to push Brassard as the best choice!)