I don't think it'll make that much difference if that's why you're considering hysto over top surgery. The T overruns the oestrogen production and suppresses it, as evident by cessation of the menses. As far as I understand, after a hysto doses can go down a little but I doubt that'd save you a ton of money (someone can correct me if I'm wrong here). Also worth noting that once you have a hysto, that's it! You're on hormones for life and if you're worried about money - pre-hysto if you can't afford T your body will be able to handle the cessation better than having absolutely nothing after a hysto. Removal is often more because it's body parts that person won't use anyway so if it's unwanted, even if the risk of cancer is unconfirmed, it's not worth risking for most. Also it brings one closer to male, especially with regards to correct gender markers. But risks aren't confirmed (not enough information), and the procedure is merely recommended, not a physical necessity (unless issues arise), although that shouldn't be confused with necessity for some individuals who need that step for mental well being.
For me I'm more interested in top surgery first because that's something I can physically see. I'm not going to essentially see a lack of something inside, but I will feel better with a proper flat chest. But then if you don't have a big chest, then hysto might be preferable for gender marker reasons.
The way I see it for myself is that here in Canada I can get a Drivers license with a M gender marker. So getting a hysto isn't a major rush for me unless problems arise. My chest however, I want that gone a decade ago, so that's definitely a priority for me.