Quote from: Jess42 on May 08, 2014, 09:00:14 AM
You got that right James. The road to hell is paved with good intentions in the beginning anyway. Socialism and communism are very good theories in thought and on paper. Everyone working together on a common goal, taking care of our fellow humans and not letting them suffer and so on. But when the human element is added into the mix with greed, powerlust, dellusions of granduer and striving to be the supreme leader, Eutopia turns into a living hell really quick.
(My emphasis above.)
I very much agree to this. I think bigotry, exclusion and so on are, in a sense, basic human traits - not everyone has them, but every group does. And it seems to be rather evenly distributed. What makes the religious kind of bigotry more visible, is in part media coverage, and in part the tendency of believers to focus more on spreading their message. So while your average, secular, areligious (or in many cases only nominally religious) bigot beats up someone outside a bar, the average religious bigot proclaims their views in church, town square or media. I'm not saying the latter is better, since it may influence some of the nominally religious; they pick up on the hate, but not the nonviolence. In a sense, the principle of double effect can be applied - while the message is to convert peacefully (in most cases), the result may be violence.
All of this said, some of the most wonderfully inclusive, open and unbigoted (if that is a word) individuals I've met are religious, and conservatively so. At the same time, some of the worst, hateful bigots I've encountered are religious. But I could just as well say that some of the most wonderful and so on individuals are atheists, while some of the worst and so on individuals are atheists. Given the size of the groups, you are bound to find all variants within them. I find it is rather evenly distributed - but I feel personally safer around religious bigots than areligious ones, even though they may worsen the total picture with regards to violence. Some of them may say some horrible things, but they won't beat me up physically. Then of course that can cause self-destructive behavior depending on the state of the recipient, so I'm definitely not saying it's harmless. I've told people of that sort that they have blood on their hands, since words can most definitely "pierce like a sword", as the Bible says.
To conclude, statements like "organized religion is the greatest source of evil in history"
is to some extent correct. But the statement "organized religion is the greatest source of good in history" would
also be correct, to some extent. Simply because organized religion is so big, that it's probably a factor in mostly everything that happens, both good and bad. This is why I refuse to make blanket statements about any religion - they're only partially true at best, and directly false at worst.