I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down. I think the 4.5" and 5.5" is perfect for me. I can't wait to see it. Do we just email our suggestions?

Quote from: Ethedon on June 14, 2014, 09:38:12 PM
I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down. I think the 4.5" and 5.5" is perfect for me. I can't wait to see it. Do we just email our suggestions?

Since you seem so interested Ethedon I would email them and tell them you worked with them before and want to learn about the STP.  Tell them you heard from some guys from the Philly conference about it.  Or call them directly.  As someone who has supported their company, I bet they would like to hear from you.  They really did seem eager for opinions.

I think it would be awesome if they posted pictures on their website and asked opinions.

In terms of the length each of us like, I think it depends on how you wear the packer (what you put it in).  I read guys talk about how the 3.5 sticks straight out, but that doesn't happen to me.  I think whatever length the person like is the right length for them.

Quote from: Ethedon on June 14, 2014, 09:38:12 PM
I believe the shorter the packer the more of a bulge you get because it doesn't actually lay down.

I hadn't considered that. I can see what you mean now that I think about it.

Quote from: Brett on June 14, 2014, 03:52:58 PM
I went back to look at it again today.  Seeing it next to the regular flaccid, I noticed the STP version is bigger.  The tab seems bigger, too.  I asked and found out that the shaft is 5.5 inches (sorry for my error in the first post).  I would describe the receptable as being similar to the Go Girl.  Pick up your flaccid RM and core it out in the shape of a Go Girl (that type funnel), and that would describe the look of the inside.  Nowhereboi would you agree that this is a good way to describe it?

The would like to do the realistic testicles.  The owner is currently on search for find a lighter set than what you has found available.  Like Nowhereboi said, they ask people for their opinions.

Agreed...very much like the Go Girl, but it looks as if there's room to adapt it to other systems.

4 inches is big for flaccid but it's not out of the line insanely huge. I think the funnel arrangement looks a bit like the laboratory nine (later models), where the funnel piece is created partly by the balls. It's a prosthetic, so obviously it's different.  It looks a bit like their 4 inch model. Now imo, it could be made into a 3 way. I said to Jesse, haha they all remembered me from last year, that you could put a rod in there. He said they weren't and I said "yeah but theoretically" and he agreed. Perhaps I put a bug in his ear.
To me they could also use the same model for a packer.

i thought it looked pretty nice, btw.

--Jay

For the people saying 4" is too big and might attract attention, I just want to say that post op I'm at about 5" and it doesn't look obscene. I always packed small with the same fear that you guys had, but unless you have a huge one, it's not gonna seem to big. I hardly have a noticable bulge except in gym shorts and sweats. Don't worry, your junk doesn't look as huge as you think.

I've packed with 4 inches and did it discretely, i.e I didn't really want someone to see a bulge. It's very doable. Their designs lay flat and down unlike say something like Mr Limpy where the shaft wants to stick straight up (of course mostly they aren't making packers). It's possible they could make this into a packer, but no immediate plans anyway.

--Jay

I think I would probably buy this. The Peacock gen 2 was a huge failure for me. I can't even use it.