Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Absolutely Disgusting Transphobic Article from CWA

Started by katia, September 15, 2007, 07:25:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

katia

Absolutely Disgusting Transphobic Article from CWA


Naed Irega Live Journal
9/14/2007


'This incredibly insulting, hateful, wildly ill-informed article appeared today on the Concerned Women for America website. It is anti-LGBT in general but focuses the majority of its venom on trans people-- specifically, on trans women. The language is very inflammatory. The avowed purpose of the piece is to motivate conservatives to lobby their congresspeople to oppose ENDA. The real purpose seems to be to incite hatred towards trans women by misrepresenting them and playing on ignorant people's fears'.
  •  

Thundra

Yeah, well, I've been warning people in this community for years that they were going to come after you all soon. Now you will see what it is like to have to live with the bullseye on your back for once. I'm not talking about the passive discrimination you have to deal with daily. I'm talking about well-financed organizations that exist strictly to harrass you and deny you any solace. They are coming after you and they are going to make you a major point of contention in the election year upcoming. Don't expect too much support from the Dems either. You'll be lucky to get ENDA passed.
  •  

Butterfly

Quote from: Thundra on September 15, 2007, 11:11:53 PM
Now you will see what it is like to have to live with the bullseye on your back for once. I'm not talking about the passive discrimination you have to deal with daily. I'm talking about well-financed organizations that exist strictly to harrass you and deny you any solace. They are coming after you and they are going to make you a major point of contention in the election year upcoming. Don't expect too much support from the Dems either. You'll be lucky to get ENDA passed.

Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but you seem to be enjoying this, Thundra.  Your comments seem full of resentment & anger, which is all right if it is directed to the opposers of ENDA, not us. ???
  •  

Thundra

#3
Miss Fly,

QuoteForgive me if I'm mistaken, but you seem to be enjoying this, Thundra.  Your comments seem full of resentment & anger, which is all right if it is directed to the opposers of ENDA, not us.

You are completely mistaken. I am NOT enjoying this at all. I hate it when I'm right. But, if you people thought you had it tough before, you are about to see it go up another notch. Everything is relative. I hear people that transition cry about how tough it is for them. Granted, it is tough. But now you will get to walk a mile in the queer communities shoes. They have been targeting us for abuse for decades. With the inclusion of gender identity in ENDA protections, it was bound to happen.
  •  

SusanK

There is reason to be concerned - I amazed how the writer confuses CD's with transwomen, especially an attorney who should know the difference - but I wouldn't be too concerned. I noticed they opposed the rule in Washington (state) requiring pharmicists to fill Plan-B prescriptions if they feel it violates their personal views. Right now they can refuse only if another pharmacists is on duty in the same pharmacy to fill the order.

This group is not concerned about women, but by their own admission, wanting to exert biblical views in public policy. Curious they support freedom of religion, but I wonder how far that goes when someone else's religion conflicts with their Christian views. Mostly they're simply against human rights and liberties. They're against "judicial activism" except when it promotes religious rights and views - strange how that's not judicial activitism.

It's ironic their own national attorney, shown here, has been there done that (violated every one of their principles) and became an evangelical Christian to support her new views. I'm sorry, someone with her experience doesn't have the right to disapprove of others doing the same thing simply because she's changed.

--Susan--
  •  

Thundra

Yoy!  Now she is a piece of work, that LaRue.

First of all, married to the author LaRue that writes the books about the end of the world from their conservative christian POV. They all get saved, we all get killed and rot in hell. They are right, we are wrong.

Then, after all of that abuse she reveals in the article, she makes the statement that she did not need therapy, because the day she became a christian, all of those "feelings" went away.
OK, yeah sure, if you say so lady.

And she regrets having an abortion, so no one else should have that option either.

QuoteThis group is not concerned about women, but by their own admission, wanting to exert biblical views in public policy. Curious they support freedom of religion, but I wonder how far that goes when someone else's religion conflicts with their Christian views.

I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I can tell you that women to them means born with a uterus, and man means born with a penis. And to them, if you transition, you are still how you were born, regardless of what you do to change your appearance. You are still shamefull in their eyes. If these people had their way, they would compile a list of people that transition, the same way they make lists of people that abuse children. To them, you are the same - sick and twisted. It is their way, or the highway for your kind.
  •  

Kate

Still, it raises an interesting point: does ENDA protect someone who doesn't identify as female, yet who wants to come to work wearing sexy women's clothes simply for the turn-on factor? There ARE people who are happy looking and being male, yet who find wearing a skirt or whatever highly erotic... and find that doing so in public only heightens the thrill. Which is fine and all, but in a workplace?

~Kate~
  •  

Thundra

Careful Kate, careful....

Don't go there. We have plenty of people on this list ready and willing to provide us with that service. Capiche?

I personally would love to live in a world where anybody can wear anything they want, whenever they want. Or appear femme one day, butch the next day, and androgynous the day after that. By anything they want, I don't mean nekid, OK?

It wouldn't bother me in the slightest if cross-dressers came to work en femme, or drag queens showed up in drag? Who gives a flying %&*$? As long as they can do the work, what does it matter to me? If all businesses were not allowed to force workers to dress "appropriately," than businesses could not play one against another to argue for dress decorum.

In other words, presently, one business can claim that they will lose business to the people down the street if they their employee to dress in woman's clothes or vice versa, whereas the guy down the block doesn't have that policy. If all businesses were not allowed to discriminate against employees not dressing according to current gender norms, than the guy down the street would have to follow the same rules. That is what they are really afraid of. The fact that if these rules become law, than they cannot pick over a qualified candidate, or simply dismiss an employee based on how they present according to their interpretation of gender norms.

If there were no norms, there would be no problems.
  •  

Hazumu

Hundreds of children are hurt by poor housing, malnutrition and absent parents because there are those who will not suffer even a few so-called Welfare Queens to slip through and take advantage of the system and who also say when around like-minded company, "Starvation is a GREAT motivator."

There are those who will take advantage of the system for the ends you state, Kate. (alliteration unintended  :D )   But, there have been those who take advantage of the system for such purposes for years.

Where do we set the bounds?

BTW, I, too, have had trouble with that article.  It does point up an increase in the furor of the fundamentalist right to do battle against godless deviant abominations.  And to them, all's fair in this war.

Karen
  •  

Kate

Quote from: Thundra on September 16, 2007, 11:50:35 PM
I personally would love to live in a world where anybody can wear anything they want, whenever they want. Or appear femme one day, butch the next day, and androgynous the day after that. By anything they want, I don't mean nekid, OK?

I don't mind anyone wearing anything they want, be they cross-dressers, drag queens, or whatever. Gender or simple clothing preference expression is fine.

But I'll admit I DO get uncomfy if someone is wearing something *solely* to get off on it all day, doing it purely for erotic exhibitionism... basically a virtual way to masturbate in public. Imagine someone coming to work every day in a nice shiny PVC bondage outfit, hood, gag and all? An extreme example, but it's the same motivation I'm talking about.

~Kate~
  •  

Jaynatopia

It seems to me that in the end they will not only discredit conservatism further but religion as well. I think that meddling in politics and going up against non-discrimination is ultimately going to hurt the religious right.
  •  

David W. Shelton

Quote from: Thundra on September 16, 2007, 07:34:41 AM
Miss Fly,

QuoteForgive me if I'm mistaken, but you seem to be enjoying this, Thundra.  Your comments seem full of resentment & anger, which is all right if it is directed to the opposers of ENDA, not us.

You are completely mistaken. I am NOT enjoying this at all. I hate it when I'm right. But, if you people thought you had it tough before, you are about to see it go up another notch.
Everything is relative. I hear people that transition cry about how tough it is for them. Granted, it is tough. But now you will get to walk a mile in the queer communities shoes. They have been targeting us for abuse for decades. With the inclusion of gender identity in ENDA protections, it was bound to happen.

Thundra, I'm really quite astonished that you would think that the TG community hasn't already been "walking a mile" in the "queer community's shoes." The reality is that to the ignorant right, transpeople and crossdressers have long been viewed as "perverted" people who just "want to change their sex." Those of us who are gay need to understand that we ARE all in the same community. Your posts imply that the "T" is just a recent afterthought in GLBT. It's not so.

When will we realize that we ARE in the same boat together and we need to work together to bring out real change? Posts like those from Thundra in this thread clearly show that we have a long way to go. That's tragic.

There is no "us and them" versus "them." When the GLBT community (and allies) realize that we're all a part of the human community, maybe we'll be able to lead by example.
  •  

Shana A

Quote from: Kate on September 16, 2007, 06:54:02 PM
Still, it raises an interesting point: does ENDA protect someone who doesn't identify as female, yet who wants to come to work wearing sexy women's clothes simply for the turn-on factor? There ARE people who are happy looking and being male, yet who find wearing a skirt or whatever highly erotic... and find that doing so in public only heightens the thrill. Which is fine and all, but in a workplace?

Kate,

I would hope that ENDA will protect any and all gender expressions. Where is the line drawn about what is or isn't appropriate, and who is drawing that line? Even if ENDA passes, an employer who wishes to get rid of a trans employee can come up with some lame excuse about their job performance if they want to fire them.

As someone who identifies as neither gender, without the protections that ENDA offers, I'm currently only able to present as my legal birth gender, if I want to make a living that is, and that really hurts sometimes.

zythyra
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

RebeccaFog

    My church and a lot of other churches support GLBT people.  Nobody can claim that their Christianity religion prohibits the expression or existence of any person or groups because there is always a congregation up the way that will dispute those claims.
    My Minister wants me to put the GLBT flag as a banner on our website.  I think that is putting our money where our mouth is.  We also have straight members who public support GLBT issues.

   It would be nice if these articles would balance their reports by explaining that not everyone is like whoever the article is about.  I guess we need more press.


By the way, I've been trying to figure out where to get the official banner for GLBT people.  I assume it's a live banner that changes and links to GLBT headquarters, where that is.  I'm not trying to be an idiot, I just haven't found it.  Maybe I should quit writing this post and actually get to it.
  •  

Jaynatopia

Well unfortunately they get FREE press every time a GLBT related story comes up; the news media tries to balance GLBT articles with a counter-point. Guess who it usually comes from?

So, I agree there are good organizations out there but they aren't the ones that are heard.

Quote from: Rebis on September 17, 2007, 08:20:26 PM
   It would be nice if these articles would balance their reports by explaining that not everyone is like whoever the article is about.  I guess we need more press.


  •  

nickie

I have been active in trying to get my County Commissioners to add "gender identity and expression" as well as "sexual oreintation" to the HRO. I am working with a group of gays, lesbians, and straight people. the movement was started by 2 churches. This nasty article is exactly what we (the trans people working on it) feared that the opposition would say. Many times across the country the trans people have been "thrown under the bus", used as a trump card by the gay/lesbian community for a bargaining chip, i.e.: "If you strike gender identity from this, we will likely pass it". This time, there are 4 trans women working on it, and the others swear that they aren't going to accept a compromise excluding us this time. We are sort of in limbo right now, unsure which way to go, because the Commission is involved in an unrelated scandal, and likely "don't have time for us". We shall see.
  •  

katia

Quote from: Kate on September 17, 2007, 08:30:56 AM
Quote from: Thundra on September 16, 2007, 11:50:35 PM
I personally would love to live in a world where anybody can wear anything they want, whenever they want. Or appear femme one day, butch the next day, and androgynous the day after that. By anything they want, I don't mean nekid, OK?

I don't mind anyone wearing anything they want, be they cross-dressers, drag queens, or whatever. Gender or simple clothing preference expression is fine.

But I'll admit I DO get uncomfy if someone is wearing something *solely* to get off on it all day, doing it purely for erotic exhibitionism... basically a virtual way to masturbate in public. Imagine someone coming to work every day in a nice shiny PVC bondage outfit, hood, gag and all? An extreme example, but it's the same motivation I'm talking about.

~Kate~

i concord with kate on this one.  one thing is to wear the clothes of your target gender and another thing is to wear silky panties or a mini skirt because they turn you on or whatever.  yea, people can wear whatever they want, not in the workplace though.  i support enda, yet i don't support the idea of people coming to work with clothing that is inappropriate for the workplace.  capiche?
  •  

RebeccaFog

Quote from: Katia on September 23, 2007, 04:00:50 AM
Quote from: Kate on September 17, 2007, 08:30:56 AM
Quote from: Thundra on September 16, 2007, 11:50:35 PM
I personally would love to live in a world where anybody can wear anything they want, whenever they want. Or appear femme one day, butch the next day, and androgynous the day after that. By anything they want, I don't mean nekid, OK?

I don't mind anyone wearing anything they want, be they cross-dressers, drag queens, or whatever. Gender or simple clothing preference expression is fine.

But I'll admit I DO get uncomfy if someone is wearing something *solely* to get off on it all day, doing it purely for erotic exhibitionism... basically a virtual way to masturbate in public. Imagine someone coming to work every day in a nice shiny PVC bondage outfit, hood, gag and all? An extreme example, but it's the same motivation I'm talking about.

~Kate~

i concord with kate on this one.  one thing is to wear the clothes of your target gender and another thing is to wear silky panties or a mini skirt because they turn you on or whatever.  yea, people can wear whatever they want, not in the workplace though.  i support enda, yet i don't support the idea of people coming to work with clothing that is inappropriate for the workplace.  capiche?

Ironically, I find much of the clothing worn by professional women to be objectionable.  It's like, I'm working, I don't want to see your knees or your breasts.  But it's okay for them.  So, if a guy wants to show off his knees or chest hair, I just don't care anymore.

People can wear potato sacks for all I care.  (as long as they show their knees, breasts, or chest hair)

If people could wear what they want, then there'd be no thrill for the thrill seekers.  You probably wouldn't see a lot of that anymore.
  •  

Thundra

QuoteThundra, I'm really quite astonished that you would think that the TG community hasn't already been "walking a mile" in the "queer community's shoes." The reality is that to the ignorant right, transpeople and crossdressers have long been viewed as "perverted" people who just "want to change their sex." Those of us who are gay need to understand that we ARE all in the same community. Your posts imply that the "T" is just a recent afterthought in GLBT. It's not so.

DWS, I respectfully disagree with you on one point of your POV. While it is true that trans-folk have a long history of being involved in the queer community, that statement is not true of all trans-folk. As is oft rubbed in my face here, those that purport "to pass" claim to not suffer from the same level of distress as many others in the community. And so, in fact, many DO NOT SUPPORT queer folks or our agenda of change. They do not owe anyone anything. They have nothing in common with queers, or the queer agenda. Because they are str8 men and women, for whom the rules against queers do not apply. Simply put, it is not their fight.

Rather, their agenda is one where they find a way to change the current laws and policies so that they can legally slip under the radar as it were. It is their right to do so, but that POV does nothing to help many others that come from the same background that either do not wish to slip under the radar in stealth mode, or that cannot "pass" in their estimation.

If you read the postings here, they draw a very strong line in the sand, as to the distinctions between themselves and those other people. They believe that transgendered people, transsexual people, and people that have completed transition ARE NOT the same, and so their issues are not the same. Why don't you ask THEM when we are all going to get along and fight for a single agenda? There are plenty of them here.

There are two distinct strategies being deployed to battle for the rights of the gender-variant. The mainstream queer formula is to gradually remove the barriers between what is considered "normal" and aberrant, so that without distinctions, all people live their life as they see fit without suffering from discriminatory practices now enshrined in public policy. The second strategy is used by many from the same background, whose aim is strictly to find a way that they themself, and they alone can live that same type of life by finding a way to tweak and circumvent the current rules. And if they can do so without having a to lift a finger themselves, mores the better.

Most queers are moving to the POV that we need a new paradigm for everyone to achieve equality. Whereas, many people here have reminded me that they don't need a new paradigm, they get along just fine the way things are because they "pass," and they don't owe anyone anything. Which, let me state again, is their right. Str8 people are already protected under the current laws, so this battle does not concern them. They can already marry the partner of their choice, as long as no one outs them for instance.

My posting was referring to the fact that as the conservative right becomes more desperate to seek out wedge issues to facilitate finding fears to motivate amerikans to vote against Dems, one of the things they will go after is gender-variant people. And in their POV, there is no difference between someone that "passes," and someone that does not. In fact, to them, those that "pass" are more dangerous and insidious to their belief system.

If the right decides trans-folk are worth going after as a wedge issue, and I think they will, these people with their "heterosexist POV" might be surprised to find out that the nice quiet life of stealth they have been enjoying might come to a sudden grinding halt. DWS, you know as well as I do that even if the conservatives are defeated in this election this is so not over ~ by any means. There will be a backlash. And it will be ugly. The difference is that this time trans-folk will not be considered fringe players, especially if ENDA passes. They will be a target just like queer folks.

And one last thing. Why don't you ask trans-folk whether they want a "T" in GLBT, because from what I've been hearing, most do not. They are not queer. They are just ordinary men and women, and our fight is not their fight.

Posted on: September 23, 2007, 01:16:41 PM
QuoteIf people could wear what they want, then there'd be no thrill for the thrill seekers.  You probably wouldn't see a lot of that anymore.

Exactly. If there is no "normal," and no weird, than what exactly is the issue? It's just people making choices for themselves. All the barriers are artificially derived anyway. What is most perturbing to me personally, is when the very people that expected other people to allow them to transition without having barriers placed in their way, then turn around and obfuscate other people on the same path, and even denigrate them in many cases if they are a little different than themselves. It is not very mature or supportive, or attractive.
  •  

Hazumu

Quote from: ThundraAnd in their POV, there is no difference between someone that "passes," and someone that does not. In fact, to them, those that "pass" are more dangerous and insidious to their belief system.

Exactly.

That's why I went to the Real ID town hall.  Because I was afraid that if the fundies hijacked the system, our IDs would reflect our birth sex, and it would be tantamount to wearing one of these on all my clothes:



Now, I don't out myself every time I go and buy a pack of gum.  It appears that I pass well -- no eyebrows shooting up or giggles once my back is turned, etc.  But I'm not going to fool myself into thinking I pass 100% in all situations.  However, most people are dull that way, and I pass just fine.

There are other situations where I'm more likely to be read.  Last night I went to an event with two other trans-women.  One was rather unpassable, and I'm sure that she got the other two of us read.  It did not diminish my enjoyment of the evening and the film and the company I was with one whit.  And now when I go out to the store in about an hour, I'm sure that I'll pass just fine in that situation.

But what if the fundies get us ALL marked, somehow?  What if I have to show my ID to buy a pack of gum, and the ID says, in big, fat letters, "MALE"?

Even if you pass perfectly, you'll be outed every time you buy something, or go through a security checkpoint, or try to take care of something legal...  And then you'll be depending on those strangers to be kind to you even though they KNOW your birth-sex now...

I believe we need the hate crimes bill and ENDA passed.  And I feel that in order to convince those who would be on our side the extent and magnitude of the issue, we need a good census of transgendered persons.  Not names and addresses, but hard, verifiable numbers.  Most people are startled by the statistic that 1 in 2500 males between the ages of 18 and 65 have HAD GRS.

But we're almost invisible, and thus unworthy of much attention, except that attention of the fundies who perceive us to be a vanishingly-small, weak group that they can make sport of.   Besides, messing with the unpassable will just keep the passables in line, fearful of receiving the same treatment if ever they are outed...

Of course, the fight for equality of trans rights is only a piece of the fight for equality of rights for the LGBT community.  And that is only a piece of the fight for equality for all -- witness the recent events in Jena, Louisiana.  We're a small piece.  Perhaps we should also consider working on the larger issues as well~

Karen
  •