QuoteRESULTS:
Group A included 19 individuals with mean age of 28.6 years (range: 16-39 years) and group B included 12 individuals with mean age of 51.9 years (range: 45-59 years). The mean follow-up period was 9.2 months. Three cases had previously undergone a cricothyroid approximation elsewhere. We found a significant improvement of mean F0 from 135.8 to 206.3Hz in total (P = 0.001) and also in both groups, especially in group A (mean F0-postop = 213.8Hz). The mean frequency range had a tendency to decrease postoperatively, whereas the ESGP was significantly higher in both total sample and group A (P = 0.001, respectively). G was increased postoperatively and presented a statistical significance in group B (P = 0.035). A revision Wendler procedure was necessary for three individuals (9.7%); two of them presented a suture's line breakdown because they did not follow the postoperative recommendations for voice rest and the third one had an insufficient web due to an insufficient estimation of the necessary correction.
from the paper cited above
So it is again showing just how important post op care is, but also shows that there is quite a strain on this new commissure post op in the long run.
The pitch increase seems to be great, the higher ESGP and G are not reall sounding great. Especially a higher G which translates into breathiness, hoarseness etc.
Interesting to read that the pitch lowered with time, while Dr Kim says it actually inreases during the first year, but maybe that means it lowers later on? I gues this is natural, so the pitch inrease in any voice surgery seems to be a bit degrading with time as all stretches out.
Age seems to play a role too.
they use only 2 stitches and lasers in the paper, not microscalpels and 3 stitches. Yeson uses 3 stitches and seems to "taper" them, which may be a big advantage.
To have someone do this in the UK is intersting. how often did they perform this procedure there? Are there no former patiens who have writtena bout it or given voice samples?