Hi
Hehehe - I think the "Oracle" sounds a lot better, but thanks for comparing me to it, she is sweet. I guess better to be compared with an old lady than with a guy. at least in terms of stature we may have something in common
Ok, I am not totally sure what all changes with the resonance control, But I think for me, the larynx position is part of it. It is not the way to shift it for pitch though. In any case, guess you have gotten used to changing some things in the voice that also happen in your very relaxed voice. If that really is your base pitch, you will be way into the female range after the surgery

- beyond your 180 Hz target.Which I totally understand. A 180 Hz - thats something that would be fine for me too. If I manage to get it on average, my lowest parts still are at 130-140 Hz, which bugs me a lot , especially sind when I am tired, like yesterday, my voice becomes even more monotonous and hovers more at the lower end.
You heard it probably in the recording plus the issue I have with my resonance still being off

- no surgery can fix those.
Its a bit hard now as I had to reactivate all my vocal folds and thus my full timbre because I had some odd technique before that prevented about a third of the vocal folds to phonate when speaking (I jokingly said I simulated a VFS), but that caused tension and strain eventually, so I now am unlearning it.
My speech volume is never really good, sadly. If I am trying to be loud, the pitch goes up a lot, I am not sure if it sounds good then anymore. I definitely am squeezing then again.
I will be interested to hear what Dr Kim says about the voice break. I know that some things he says are a bit odd, like I heard some people were given the advice to not do any larynx shifting for resonance anymore - but I also think that those women here who do use resonance control a lot are having the better post op voices than those who really totally let it go.
I personally like yout 140-150 Hz recording as it has that clearly and unmistakably female sound to it. I can understand that a shift up in pitch with the same quality would be neat, but I think you can use your voice very freely as it is and probably experiment with it a lot. Part of my voice rehab was for example to use the voice in a way that does not break at that break. That was a really neat thing to learn although I cannot 100% trust it yet.
And I am so sorry about being so supercritical. It is my nature as a scientist probably

- plus my bad experience with surgeries before this one.
I was so frustrated about my voice in that recording yesterday, I cannot tell you how much. It gave me the realization again that there are still a lot of things to do to recover from my mistakes of th epast years and then improve my voice. What I really would need to know is if a surgery makes my voice better or worse in some aspects (fullness, volume, pitch ar all affected) and if it makes it harder or easier to get the other things better (relaxation, resonance, inflection,...). Dr Kim kind of warned me that with my voice issues he probably cannot feminize my voice completely and that my recovery would be longer than usual, which totally increased me being worried... (not a good thing to say to someone ubercritical like me

)
Bye