Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Variations of GRS

Started by Phoenix_2812, November 11, 2014, 01:35:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Phoenix_2812

I was wondering, when going for GRS, is it possible to have the genitals (including testicles) removed but not have a "cavity" and an opening? I only ask, because the idea of having GRS done one day is more prefereble to transitioning and keeping all the "external plumbing", but I don't really relish the idea of having to dialate. My reason for this, is that I don't really like the idea of having sexual intercourse as either male or female (with either of their respective genitals), although if I were to transition, I'd like to have something of a relatively smooth/flat area, much like a ciswoman would have.

Does anyone know if such a thing is possible with GRS?

Thanks.
"When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us." -Helen Keller
  •  

mrs izzy

Some surgeon offer a cosmetic version of GCS. You would have everything but the neo vagina.

Mrs. Izzy
Trans lifeline US 877-565-8860 CAD 877-330-6366 http://www.translifeline.org/
"Those who matter will never judge, this is my given path to walk in life and you have no right to judge"

I used to be grounded but now I can fly.
  •  

ImagineKate

I'm not fond of the idea of dilating either... but I figured I'd remain a non-op, but I am thinking that could change.

Doesn't your birth defect shrink down in size anyway?
  •  

Phoenix_2812

Quote from: ImagineKate on November 11, 2014, 02:00:06 PM
I'm not fond of the idea of dilating either... but I figured I'd remain a non-op, but I am thinking that could change.

Doesn't your birth defect shrink down in size anyway?

That is what happens in the majority of cases, but it still means that if you go the non-op route, that you'll still have Mr. Winkle hanging around, but just in reduced size.

I think of myself as asexual, so the thought of sexual intercourse is something that I really dislike, hence why I wouldn't want to dialate
"When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us." -Helen Keller
  •  

Phoenix_2812

Quote from: mrs izzy on November 11, 2014, 01:52:02 PM
Some surgeon offer a cosmetic version of GCS. You would have everything but the neo vagina.

So what would it look like, just the end of the penis sitting flush with the top of the thighs, like a vigina, but not exactly like one? What does GCS stand for, Genital Corrective Surgery? If it was possible to go down that route, it would be good.
"When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us." -Helen Keller
  •  

cass

Here is a link to james bellringer's photo gallery, obviously this contains pictures of vaginas so is not work safe... http://bellringers.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/styled-5/index.html the second from the end is a cosmetic operation
  •  

Myarkstir

Quote from: ImagineKate on November 11, 2014, 02:00:06 PM
I'm not fond of the idea of dilating either... but I figured I'd remain a non-op, but I am thinking that could change.

Doesn't your birth defect shrink down in size anyway?

Nope
Sylvia M.
Senior news staff




  •  

ImagineKate


Quote from: Phoenix_2812 on November 11, 2014, 02:15:18 PM
So what would it look like, just the end of the penis sitting flush with the top of the thighs, like a vigina, but not exactly like one? What does GCS stand for, Genital Corrective Surgery? If it was possible to go down that route, it would be good.

I believe GCS stands for Gender Confirmation Surgery?
  •  

Jenna Marie

"Cosmetic" GRS looks exactly like the kind with a vagina - there's  inner and outer labia, clitoris and hooding, and urethral repositioning - but where the vagina would be is about a 1" "dimple" instead of a full vaginal canal. Basically, it's exactly what it sounds like you're asking for; identical to a cis woman's in every respect except that there's no vagina and therefore no dilation.
  •  

Phoenix_2812

Quote from: Jenna Marie on November 11, 2014, 07:26:58 PM
"Cosmetic" GRS looks exactly like the kind with a vagina - there's  inner and outer labia, clitoris and hooding, and urethral repositioning - but where the vagina would be is about a 1" "dimple" instead of a full vaginal canal. Basically, it's exactly what it sounds like you're asking for; identical to a cis woman's in every respect except that there's no vagina and therefore no dilation.

Thank you for the description, it answered my question. :)
"When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us." -Helen Keller
  •  

suzifrommd

Re: the cosmetic-only option, I assumed I would never want anyone between my legs. Now that I have a vagina, curiously, I find that I'm now interested in penetrative sex. My sexual interests actually changed. Though I'm somewhat different from you, in that having a vagina was always important to me.
Have you read my short story The Eve of Triumph?
  •  

Jenna Marie

Glad to help. :)

The pictures that were posted were a huge help to ME, too - I'd never seen actual photos of the result! It's quite nice, in fact.
  •  

Amy1988

With that kind of surgery could you still get your gender legally changed to female?
  •  

mrs izzy

Quote from: Amy1988 on November 13, 2014, 01:47:26 PM
With that kind of surgery could you still get your gender legally changed to female?

Have to check the state your BC Is issued for there requirements. Lots of changes had happened.
Mrs. Izzy
Trans lifeline US 877-565-8860 CAD 877-330-6366 http://www.translifeline.org/
"Those who matter will never judge, this is my given path to walk in life and you have no right to judge"

I used to be grounded but now I can fly.
  •  

Jenna Marie

I believe *most* states that require irrevocable genital surgery would consider this to count - you sure as heck don't have a penis anymore, and can you imagine the hassles (and the complaints!) if they required a minimum vaginal depth?  :) Honestly, I could be wrong, but I don't think the lawmakers are usually even well enough informed on GRS options to know this is out there...
  •