I mean, I'm looking at photos and it seems the people who have real results, you know, people you'd think couldn't pass and then end up passing totally from HRT, seem to have started at 20-21 or younger. Is there even a point in starting at 26, a few months from 27? I mean, my HGH must be all but used up and I'm sure I've shut up shop for puberty in the last couple years. I can be on HRT tomorrow, but I just don't know...
I just can't see having drastic results like some girls do and to be honest, I feel like I'd need drastic results. I just can't see it at 26 and with a full on male skeleton. At my age and weight it seems pretty unlikely that I'll have adequate changes. I'm sure I'll get breast growth, but I'm also sure they'll end up being very underdeveloped and strangely shaped. I can't see getting any fat on my butt or hips either. I'd love to watch my face chance and my body as well, but I feel I'd have to weigh a lot for that to happen, enough that I'd look huge based off the weight alone and I just can't see how I could end up looking more feminine.
I don't really know what to do or even what I'm looking for in posting this, but is there a huge difference between starting at 20ish and starting at 26? I'm pretty sure there is and I'm having a difficult time coming to terms with that. On ->-bleeped-<- there's a girl who started at 20 and after 4 years has a totally different face and body. She was skinny like myself, actually had a very similar built to me, until I grew a bit more that is. She seems to have developed to around a d-cup. I've read plenty saying that at 20 a female body is still achievable, but at 26 is it just kind of minor changes? I just feel like there's no point.