Why does no-one explore the 'floppiness' of a packer when reviewing them. I use this term as a measure for realism. Ok, I've never actually touched a real penis but I have done lots of research (watched lots of porn) and I reckon I have a good handle on the amount of wobble that a packer should have to feel and look real.

I want a person to review packers based on their ability to do the 'helicopter'. I have a reelmagik basic packer and it is sooo stiff (not in the good way) and has virtually no jiggle/wobble/movement at all. Combined with how heavy it is, it literally hurts to pack with it, but perhaps that's just me. I previously had a 5.5 inch sailor soft pack which had good wobble but was way too firm and didn't have any 'give' inside the pants which made it look like I was packing an anaconda. I also have a masho packer and this is really squishy/wobbly which is good. The downside is that it's too small and the permanent downwards angle makes it impossible to do the helicopter.

Anyway, all joking aside, I just want to be able to lay on my back and have my packer lay on my stomach and/or thigh (like cis guys do) and not permanently bent downwards at an awkward angle. Am I the only one that desires this? Has anyone found a packer that can recreate the physics of a normal penis? Is that asking for too much?

Omg, the helicopter thing isn't even possible if the shaft is engorged. If you know about "showers" and "growers," then it's only like half of the people who have penises that could feasibly do it. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you, unless you are trying to reenact the SNL Digital Short "Threeway."
Porn is almost never a good reference for realism... Unless you're talking about noticing that some guys have curved shafts because of the way they pack theirs in tight or loose underwear, and how they tuck unwanted erections away. I get that you want completely realistic, but I think you may want to just adjust your expectations. Or buy one that you use without clothes, in conjunction with the one you already have for wearing under clothes.

     Hugs,
- Katie
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I know what you mean I've wanted that too. Packers can be very stiff. I like my peecock a lot because it's pretty floppy and has a lot of movement.

Quote from: Obfuskatie on October 27, 2015, 06:17:43 AM
Omg, the helicopter thing isn't even possible if the shaft is engorged. If you know about "showers" and "growers," then it's only like half of the people who have penises that could feasibly do it. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you, unless you are trying to reenact the SNL Digital Short "Threeway."
Porn is almost never a good reference for realism... Unless you're talking about noticing that some guys have curved shafts because of the way they pack theirs in tight or loose underwear, and how they tuck unwanted erections away. I get that you want completely realistic, but I think you may want to just adjust your expectations. Or buy one that you use without clothes, in conjunction with the one you already have for wearing under clothes.

Ha yeah I do have high expectations. It'll be my downfall, but if no helicopter than just general floppy-ness.

Quote from: jdowellc on October 27, 2015, 09:28:41 PM
Ha yeah I do have high expectations. It'll be my downfall, but if no helicopter than just general floppy-ness.

You could just be up front and explain that your member might be a little different than what your partner is used to. Think of it as an excellent opportunity to test how much of an ... jerk they are.  And then you'll no longer have to associate with someone who doesn't deserve you ;-)


     Hugs,
- Katie
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote from: CursedFireDean on October 27, 2015, 07:26:38 PM
I know what you mean I've wanted that too. Packers can be very stiff. I like my peecock a lot because it's pretty floppy and has a lot of movement.

I've never had a Peecock but people give them plenty of praise. I've worried about the size of the bulge with those though. I'm a very thin guy who wears small pants and I'm really paranoid about that stuff. I can't stand the thought that all my relatives (parents, sisters, etc, who I see often) can see that I'm packing and they know I have 'nothing' there normally. It makes me shudder at the thought, so my packer has to be discrete, hence Masho is my favorite at the moment. I don't wear for looks anyway, just for my psychological well-being.

Quote from: Obfuskatie on October 27, 2015, 09:33:37 PM
You could just be up front and explain that your member might be a little different than what your partner is used to. Think of it as an excellent opportunity to test how much of an ... jerk they are.  And then you'll no longer have to associate with someone who doesn't deserve you ;-)

That would be a good test. I'll get back to you on that

Quote from: jdowellc on October 27, 2015, 09:36:14 PM
I've never had a Peecock but people give them plenty of praise. I've worried about the size of the bulge with those though. I'm a very thin guy who wears small pants and I'm really paranoid about that stuff. I can't stand the thought that all my relatives (parents, sisters, etc, who I see often) can see that I'm packing and they know I have 'nothing' there normally. It makes me shudder at the thought, so my packer has to be discrete, hence Masho is my favorite at the moment. I don't wear for looks anyway, just for my psychological well-being.

To be honest I would NOT recommend peecock at the current moment, I and another member here both got new ones that ripped very quickly after using one of their harnesses. I emailed and they never got back to me about getting it fixed or even a suggestion on how to stop the tear from growing or anything. Nothing. Not a word. They're refusing to acknowledge that their own product is ripping the prosthetic.
I have heard good things about Freetom recently, the reason I didn't order from them at the time was because I can't get out of my mind the terrible reviews of them when they first came out. Since then they fixed things and have only had good reviews from what I've seen. They're very similar from what I've seen. 
As for the packing, at this point I would consider myself an experienced packer and I have no issue getting it unnoticeable with the right underwear. I have a friend who has... well seen a lot of dicks. And she told me that mine is HUGE compared to most guys (5.5 inches) and I still am able to pack with little issue. Certain underwears do cause it to ride up and look like a big boner but I always blame user error since it's the underwear that makes it not work as well. However I can see why it would be more difficult if you were newer to packing. When I was new to packing I was not nearly as good at positioning it in a good place.

Anyways this got away from your original question, I think the reason so few packers can do that is because the material just doesn't stretch like skin. You would need something that could fold easily but also stretch easily in order for the dick to flop upwards like onto your stomach for example. I think it's nearly impossible to get that in a solid object, it would have to be multiple layers of different materials. Does that make sense, I'm not sure I'm explaining it well?