Quote from: Melissa on February 15, 2006, 11:01:03 AMMy little girl is heavily into stuffed bears, princesses, flowers, dolls, making herself look "pretty" and many other girly things.
IDENTITY:Although women *tend* to be feminine on average, those traits don't seem to make one female. Janet Reno, for example, is very much a woman. But I can't imagine her having played with dolls, flowers, and trying to be "pretty."
The catch is, while genetic women can pretty much do and act any way they darn well please and STILL be considered female (if they identify thusly), transsexual women are not afforded that same luxury - not even by themselves, which is interesting. You see it all over the forums... many of us find ourselves searching for feminine traits (emotional and physical) to "prove" that we're really female. And while that's understandable - since we don't have the physical evidence to support our internal feelings - it's also a bit hypocritical. Chasing a ghost of self-doubt.
No, whatever IT is - this elusive identity thing - it seems to exist independent, unjustifiable, and sometimes downright rebellious of stereotype.
PHYSICAL SEX:Hormones. For me anyway, hormones define when I'd consider myself "female" physically. I could have facial surgery, breast implants, and SRS... but without hormones I think I'd still feel the dysphoria with my body. Conversely, with nothing BUT hormones I *think* I would finally start to feel female, though I might remain unhappy with my appearance. There's satisfaction in knowing my *body* thinks it's female, which is what HRT would provide. A bit tricky though, since post-menopausal women are still female, regardless of hormone levels. But still, for me, HRT seems to be the foundation for finally feeling female physically.
LEGALLY:SRS or perhaps 2 years on HRT. I think the legal perspective is to keep functioning penises out of places they don't belong, such as women's rooms, etc. It's not an ethical or identity issue, it's just a practical concern for women's safety and privacy.