Quote from: warlockmaker on January 04, 2016, 10:47:05 PM
What is it that causes so many of us to be so very critical of each other. I get it, that we all have our own unique journeys but it's not the only story that's valid. I look at Caitlyn Jenner and her bravery and courage to come out so publicly has been a blessing to our community. If nothing else, we have to admit, she has greatly raised the awareness of our situation. Yet, sadly I see the vicious attacks by so many of us, what a sad example of how to behave. How can we ask for acceptance and tolerance when we cannot even accept one of our own???
Dear WLM:
When I transitioned in the early 2000 things were different and yet today much the same. This is the perspective I comment from. In addition, I'm somewhat center-right politically and fiscally, pretty low key socially, deeply committed to capitalism and the free marketplace, and believe all forms of extremism and fundamentalism are hateful and recessive. (You have been warned . . .

LOL)
Consider for a moment that if we were to change the medical/behavioral nature of the conversation from GID to say obesity, then I think we might view the social discourse and its impact somewhat differently, including what the question means. (BTW: I'm not an expert in obesity and picked it only for reasons of how society seems to respond to that condition and the potential similarities to transgender, aka GID). I see many parallels between to the two conditions, their afflicted membership, stereotyping, and the associated attractors and detractors. YMMV here, but for the sake of the conversation let's continue if you can.
At my time of transition, I thought there would be a general sense of common purpose and togetherness in the LGBT community and even more so in the trans-community. I was shocked during my first year at how unaligned, competitive and dismissive the four major sun-communities were with regard to each other, and to this day that still exists more or less, though the ilk's of HRC for example decry this being pointed out. Sure, there were and are a few exceptions such as Susan's Place, Lambda . . . but they do not constitute a viable unifying voice community wide; HRC tries and perhaps in time they'll make a real dent in this matter.

As a counter example to the LGBT community, consider the NRA (and forget whatever you may think of them), and consider how tightly their membership (public, private and corporate) are wired together. Again, put aside all your personal notions about the NRA, except for their sense of a single voice, efforts to mobilize the community when needed, exercise political power and the ability to raise money! Believe me, for 3-4 million people (and I'm not a member), they have their act together. And yes, there is carping from the peanut gallery but that never gets in way of their mission.

And therein is gist of the matter. The trans-community does not have an articulated mission that is broadly and deeply bought into. When someone tries to do so, they typically find themselves in skirmish after skirmish with some faction or another that has an axe to grind rather being willing to play a bigger game at the potential sacrifice of their or some one's personal agenda. (Jenner is a good example and I'm not defending her, but the community can't seem to wait to make her wrong; what a waste!) In my experience, the trans-community (I am one and love us to death) would rather quibble over lesser matters of someone's perceived correctness and lack of acceptance versus creating a big enough tent for most TGs to gather under and pursue a broader agenda that may not be optimum for anyone but better for all.
If this sounds like the political landscape in the US today, it should. Until we can get over being special in order to collectively be great, don't expect to see much cohesion and unification that makes much difference in our society. To put it another way, we are where the gay community was 30-50 years ago depending upon geography, social status and income - the drivers of just about all human behavior. We have a ton of work to do that demands we agree to disagree on lesser details but are jointly undefeatable on the larger issues of pursuit of happiness, fairness, and equal opportunity.

Well, there you have it: The Good, The Bad and Ugly. But please keep in mind this is only my voice, and be advised if you begin to believe and behave as if this were true you are going be dropped from several people's socially desirable's list. I'm in my 70s and could give a flip!

Rachel