Quote from: AnxietyDisord3r on January 18, 2017, 06:53:34 AM
You know, I think you're swimming in misogyny and just can't see it.
No. I am not. It certainly is telling how some people see an opinion that doesn't immediately gel with their own and label it
misogynist. Did you read the last paragraph of my post? How do you arrive at the opinion I am swimming in hatred of women?
QuoteHilary Clinton was utterly demonized and despised, for the crime of ... nothing. She did nothing. Except be female. That's misogyny that's as plain as the nose on your face. (I'm not saying it's the only reason she lost, I'm saying it was out and proud during the whole campaign, though.)
And you could say Donald Trump is despised a whole lot more than she is. She's a presidential candidate. They both came in for enormous amounts of hate, adoration, criticism. Neither of them are innocent either. The vast majority of the dislike for Clinton I saw came not from the fact she was female, but because of the rumors of the DNC fixing her place as candidate. Or from her hawkish stance on Syria. Or her insistence on seeking further conflict with Russia rather than pursuing a diplomatic approach. Or her screw-up with the email server. Or the handling of the Libyan embassy and the "removal" of Gaddafi. In fact have yet to see someone rail on Clinton "because she is a woman".
And Trump? He had plenty of disgust, hate, laughter thrown his way too. And he complained about it. Which is ludicrous because what did he expect.
QuoteMansplaining is not grasping at straws, it's an accurate description of what happens to qualified, accomplished women who happen to be feminine too. Any old guy suddenly thinks he can explain stuff to her--sometimes even her own work!
This is the
definition of a first-world problem. Someone explained something to me I already knew. Stop the press.
Not only is it ridiculous - I've had people explain things to me as both female and male that I already knew and I didn't pop a blood vessel from indignation, in fact I said "yeah I know," and furthered the conversation with my knowledge - but people honestly think this is some sort of problem? People actually believe
conversations now need to policed or that conversations of this type equal some sort of
hatred and need to be punished? Do you see how if you begin doing this men will not even want to speak to women, if they run the risk of a misogyny label if it "comes out the wrong way"? How is this going to realistically improve gender relations? How about you accept that you can't control what every single person says and they aren't going to say things you like all of the time? It beats the 1984-esque nightmare some people out there seem to be trying to craft.
QuoteJulia Serrano came up with a word to describe society's phobia of effeminate men, effemmimania. I'd say it stems from society's disdain and even loathing for feminine women. Women are in a double bind, contempt if you're feminine, contempt if you're masculine (although career wise being masculine was a smooth move for me).
Or how about its contempt for men's freedom? If society truly had a phobia of women and femininity, women wouldn't have the freedom to express it that they do - they would be forced to act like men and the femininity would be beaten out of them as it tends to be out of men. It's not that society hates the feminine, it's that it does not tolerate men's freedom to express. It is men whom society wants to beat and purge things out of. Not women.
QuoteHaving gone from female to male, even total strangers take me more seriously. I think it's the deeper voice. I'm also free of the constant casual disrespect that women get in public. I know misogyny is real, I've experienced it. But it's not just a hatred of women, it's a hatred of femininity. Even 2nd wave feminism couldn't get past that and hated on femininity as well. They treated anyone who was feminine as if they were brainwashed and working for the enemy instead of contending that there might be something worthy and valuable about a trait so many are just born with. This is why 2nd wave was set up to hate MTFs, why they challenge these notions that masculine is just "normal" and feminine is "slave mentality". I think once you understand there are two axes, male and female, masculine and feminine, the way in which misogyny colonizes our own minds and plays out in front of us comes into focus.
I know how it works, but you seem to be only convinced of one side of the story. People take you more seriously now, great. You don't get harassed in the street, great. But are you permitted to wear a dress without funny looks or harassment? Are you allowed to express your emotions as much without people getting uncomfortable? Are you allowed to screw up as often? Do you think thugs would go as easy on you if they decided to pick on you? Do people accept your depression and sadness and comfort you as easily as they might if you looked female? If you committed a crime would they give you more or less time in the slammer than a woman? If a woman falsely accused you of raping her, whose side do you think they would take first? If she falsely accused you of beating her, do you think they would automatically take your side? If you had children and were divorced do you think the children would more likely go to you or the mother? Do you think you have any rights when it comes to someone's pregnancy and the fate of your unborn child? Because as a man, you don't. Do you think people would look more favorably on you now than a woman if they saw you sitting on the street homeless? Do you think people would more likely come to your aid if they saw you in trouble, or injured, or would they be more likely to go help a woman? Are you going to be seen as
more or
less disposable in people's eyes now? Yes. You know the answers.
A lot of feminists are absolutely convinced the only answer to all of these things is that our society hates women. It's a lot more complex than that. I can show you societies that actually treat women no better than dirt. This isn't one of them.