Quote from: LaRell on November 29, 2017, 01:11:49 PM
I am still kind of irritated by my Endocrinologists instruction to NOT take the Estradiol sublingually. The research I've found online all says that is a far better, safer way to take it. It absorbs better, and bypasses your liver. So I feel much better about taking it that way, but she says "No, just swallow it." If she is worried about my levels being too high taking it that way, I don't think that's really a problem since my blood work so far has indicated that sure it spikes, but then drops way down anyway. Is that spike really going to cause me any negative issues? My bloodwork shows that all of my other levels and kidney function and things are all perfectly fine.
I took estradiol sublingually vs orally and where it counts (well-being, breast growth, feminization), there was absolutely no difference.
As regards to high levels of estradiol, studies show much higher levels than this, even in populations whose age is quite advanced and health compromised, are relatively safe. I've been on levels consistently between 1,000-4,000 pg/ml for three years (estradiol never dropped under 1,000) and I had no issues, blood tests came back fine. In pregnant women, the risk of DVT is 0.1% despite levels between 1,000-75,000. And the following study,
Horm Metab Res. 1994 Sep;26(9):428-31."Thirteen osteopenic women received (...) estradiol valerate (...) by intramuscular injections once a week for 6 months (so called "pseudopregnancy")."
"Six patients were peri- or postmenopausal (49.5 + 4.8 years of age, group A)"
"The duration of the therapy was 6, and in 4 patients 9 months"
"Estradiol increased from 34.8 +/- 7.5 pg/ml to 3226 +/- 393 pg/ml after 3 months and to 2552 +/- 254 pg/ml after 6 months, respectively, in group A."
"In group B estradiol increased from 27.8 +/- 6.5 pg/ml to 3028 +/- 728 after 3 and to 2491 +/- 684 pg/ml after 6 months."
"We have experience with therapeutic pseudopregnancy in about 200 patients with mammahypoplasia (Lauritzen 1992). Its rate of objective and subjective tolerance is excellent."
"Investigations of lipids, liver enzymes and haemostasiology to be published later will show the absence of unwanted metabolic effects of this regimen."
"In conclusion, our data show, that the treatment (...) by means of high parenteral estrogen-progestogen depot injections is effective. Virtually no side effects occurred. The therapy is well accepted by the patients."
Quote from: LaRell on November 29, 2017, 03:36:14 PMthe article goes on to say that the graph could be a little misleading, because supposedly our bodies don't have the ability to handle that much estradiol anyway, so anything above the 1,000 pg/ml is wasted anyway.
Unsubstantiated assertion because 1) no such studies demonstrate this 2) pregnant women have levels higher than this, up to 75,000 pg/ml and if the human body couldn't handle levels above 1,000 pg/ml, why does the body produce such high amounts?
QuoteI personally feel like spreading it out over the day seems to make more sense to me.
More constant levels, less fluctuations might be better mentally because as levels drop quite precipitously, we might start to experience PMS

.