According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by Ephilei, December 27, 2008, 01:54:36 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Sophie90 on December 27, 2008, 01:57:15 PMAndrogyne doesn't have the suffix "queer".That's why I prefer it anyway.I don't know what the difference is. I assumed they were interchangeable.
Quote from: Ephilei on December 27, 2008, 02:15:01 PMQuote from: Sophie90 on December 27, 2008, 01:57:15 PMAndrogyne doesn't have the suffix "queer".That's why I prefer it anyway.I don't know what the difference is. I assumed they were interchangeable.I see. That's one reason I DO like genderQUEER.
Quote from: Sophie90 on December 27, 2008, 02:19:41 PMHmm, well, in the UK declaring yourself "queer" is a fasttrack to eating lunch by yourself in the corner.It's not a word with positive connotations.
Quote from: Shades O'Grey on December 28, 2008, 10:05:05 PMBut, I dislike genderqueer because of the suffix "queer." The dictionary definition of "queer" either implicitly or explicitly describes something that is wrong.
Quote from: Chet on December 27, 2008, 09:51:18 PMive always thought they were interchangeable. though some people seem more like one than the other. picapica for example sems like an androgyne because ze is so cool and laid back. seems like queer is too "loud". me on the otherhand... im pretty ->-bleeped-<-gy and RAWR and weird so i think genderqueer or just queer fits me pretty well.
Quote from: Pica Pica on December 29, 2008, 01:57:13 AMYeah, I never liked genderqueer, it does seem loud and trying to call attention to itself instead of being just 'there'. But that is probably because of people I've met. Most of the queer people i know have had me weighed, judged and found wanting, it seems you have to follow a very strict code to fit in, and i don't really do strict codes.
Quote from: Pneumonica on December 29, 2008, 03:49:23 AMI've never heard the word "queer" used for positive connotation. Even when used by self-described "queers", it's used in the way that racial slurs are used by members of the given race.Personally, I prefer specificity in definition, but if I had a more difficult-to-explain label I'd probably feel differently ("genderless" rolls off the tongue rather nicely). Although I will say, "androgyne" does sound really cool.
Quote from: Andra on December 29, 2008, 09:33:12 AMTo me, queer is (to quote dictionary.com): "strange or odd from a conventional viewpoint; unusually different; singular". There is no inherent value judgement in there. Negative value judgements are added to the word by people who think being different is bad. To me though, my gender is different, odd, unusual... so what? Variety is a good thing, we're all different anyway regardless of what categories a single aspect of our existence fits into. To me it's a neutral term. I guess the term can be seen as confrontational, because it's confronting the idea that being outside the norm is a bad thing. The only downside to me using the term to describe myself is it may lead people to think that I identify outside the binary solely for activism purposes. Anybody who gets to know me though will know that that's not the case at all.I don't identify as androgyne as I don't feel many of the definitions of that term I've seen (including the one for this forum) particularly resonate with me.
Quote from: Shades O'Grey on December 29, 2008, 10:20:22 AMI guess I don't see my gender identity as "odd." It's just who/what I am. Why should that be odd? And, why should I accept the notion of what others consider to be odd?I prefer a non-confrontational stance, as being confrontational has not served me well thus far. I understand that others are able to pull it off quite well. Confrontational attitudes and stances put me off, though.