Muscle memory is like riding a bike.....

But really, if hormones dictate the structure and cell ratio (grey / white) of our brains, and our brains are constantly changing - then it's pretty logical that any new growth after HRT would be consistant with whatever hormone is dominant at the time.
Quote from: Renate on January 23, 2010, 08:49:36 AM
This doesn't really explain why the average man on the street would not respond well to estrogen!
Isn't the current thinking that some hormones "glitched up" in utero in transsexuals, and created some slightly different brain structures?
Perhaps (shooting in the dark here folks) those subtle changes mean transsexuals react positivly to HRT, and cisgendered people...well... badly?
Could also be psychologial I suppose. The cisman doesn't want to be more emotional, more curvy, or a bit soft 'round the edges. The cisman likes being a man!
I know, none of this weighs up.
If hormones during our lifetime changed the sructure of our brain, then WHY does current thinking say an in utero glitch is a contributer to a
life-long non-contiguous gender identity?
Wouldn't the brain structure and therefore identity "fix itself" as soon as biologically consistant hormones started to appear?
If hormones change so much, then why does the administration of birth-sex consistant hormones not "fix" a transsexual?
Yet so many people report identity consistant HRT changing the way they think in a positive manner....
Top flight neuroscientists are still figuring it all out. Speaking as an IT tech... I should probably just go eat tacos and play with servers now