The article is ridiculous in my opinion.
QuoteSo do these trans people really wish they weren't trans? Or do they simply wish that they didn't have to face the hassles, prejudice, discrimination, and outright hatred that comes with being trans?
While your doing nothing about it "in the closet" as it were. Then there is not prejudice, discrimination or hassle yet the problem is there. In fact this is possibly the time the problem is greatest.
QuoteBeing trans, in and of itself, is not a curse...It's the society and the culture that decides whether such things are negative, positive, or neutral...If our family was proud, if we were deemed as special — or even if we were just treated matter-of-factly — would we wish that we weren't trans?
So, we would be ok with having the wrong bodies if our families were proud of us for it or if culture celebrated it. Yea right. I feel totally uncomfortable in my body and like it is not me at all but thats ok because this society likes weirdness!

QuoteI understand the purpose of the argument, because, truly, none of us did choose to be transgender (or gay, lesbian, or bisexual). No one chooses to be straight or non-trans, either. But you don't hear straight, non-trans people arguing that they didn't choose to be that way. They don't need this argument, because they have the power. We don't. That power makes their particular existence the "right" way to be.
Their existence is the right way to be because they feel right in living it. Being a transexual is self evidently wrong virtue of the feelings of wrongness you have towards your own body. Note I do not mean morally wrong! Claiming it is about power is absurd, straight and non-trans people do not use this argument (with regards to this subject, they can use it just fine for other things) because
they dont need it! That is the whole point, that they are happy in their skin.
QuoteTo say, "It wasn't my choice" is to say, "I wouldn't be this way if I could help it" — which is to say, "This is a bad way to be."
Yea, if you conflate the moral "bad" with the
normal "bad". Which is wrong to do, in the non-moral sense. Unless your purposely doing it to try and prove your ridiculous argument. Then you could say it is morally wrong as well due to it being an attempt at deception. However perhaps the author is simply not so smart. Of course when you replace "bad" with an equivalent non-moral term such as "This is an uncomfortable/upsetting/troubling etc. way to be." You realise he actually has no point to make. The whole strength of this claim rested upon a mistake in terms.
---
As if any of this has to do with society. As if I would feel happy the way I am if society was made to fit me. Some of these arguments are so ridiculous it is almost unreal. I am suspicious that he simply liked the headline of "time to lose" combined with "I didn't choose" and its rhyme, so decided to base an article around it

I sure didn't choose this and I sure as hell would choose to be genetically female. I think, but I think too much

Yea so I graduate soon, done all my exams. Gotta stay on top of my critical appraising skills.