A few random thoughts:
1. even among the GG crowd, there are gorgeous women, pretty women, average women, and homely women. All the timing in the world can't overcome bad genes (and i don't mean gender genes here)
2. photography is less trustworthy than ever these days, depending on the sight I wouldn't assume the given woman is really all that hot if you saw her at the grocery or the park.
3. while none of us here post pics which seem to strive for "runway model glamor", I would say just in the "average everyday good looks" (like one might see in the facebook av of a GG, for instance) that some of our members can hold their own with any collection I've seen. and of course, realistically, not all of us can - but I refer you back to point #1
4. All that said, YES, as a general principle, starting younger is better. but that's not a death sentence in terms of being attractive. i've not taken the first hormone, had the first surgery, or even laser - and still have 100 pounds of ugly fat I don't want...and yet I'm still already better looking than I had ever hoped to be and way better looking than "he" was. I can imagine, realistically, that if I had the money to address all those issues, and partake of a few other minimal treatments, I could pull off a reasonably above average MILF look. and i think many here have way more going for them than me.
5. In reference to #4, I, for one, have no real sense of needing to compare to the glamor girls. I'm never going to be a model or walk the red carpet or anything so the utility of that is limited. If I'm going to measure myself against any other standard than "girl next door" or "MILF" attractivness (which is basically what I'm going for) then MAYBE I might give in to the temptation of being jealous of the "sex kitten" or "bimbo" stereotype ...but that probably just goes back to my inner slut trying to get out again, lol.