I consider myself to be bisexual. Personality and what the person is like is by far the most important thing to me, but physical attraction is necessary for me as well; sometimes physical attraction comes first, and it's either fueled (sometimes heavily, as is the case in one particular situation, haha) or fizzles when the personality is known, and sometimes personality comes first and is followed by physical attraction. But, if I don't find the personality attractive, then it doesn't matter.
So far this has largely worked out, to my knowledge at least, that I tend to be physically attracted to people who also have good personalities, but I'd imagine that's not always the case.
I can't say, however, that I'm pansexual. I have no experience to back that up (whereas I do with being bisexual) and, I have to confess, androgynes and genderqueers I don't really understand -- I understand who they are and how they identify and can identify that way, but I guess I don't understand how the relationship would work as a situation. Perhaps if I were educated on that, that could change, but for now...bisexual. FTMs I see as men (and I expect the same for myself: I am male, I don't identify as FTM even if that is what I technically am, and this has proven an issue in a relationship), MTFs I see as women, intersex I will see them however they identify. So...I don't necessarily see those as a basis for an argument of pansexuality.
All of that said...I also seem to have borderline commitment issues, so...haha. I came to that realization not too long ago. I understand that relationships are about compromises and sacrifices, but I'm looking to make as minimal compromises and sacrifices on what I want to do as possible. Selfish? Perhaps. But I'm also not a guy who feels he needs to be in a relationship, so...it works.