Quote from: Samantharz on March 13, 2012, 11:26:43 PM
The voice is a red flag the overall situation. If you have a Tom Waits voice, and people clock you as being transsexual, there's a very real possibility of being shunned or assaulted.
I am 6'5. The tone and timbre of my voice will never be a first indicator regarding my "overall situation."
Quote"Please move" implies that you can escape it. There are bigots EVERYWHERE, don't become complacent. If you feel that you want to live your life as a woman with a deep voice and potentially get "clocked" wherever you go, more power to you, I pray to the FSM for your safety. But I feel it's a transwoman's obligation to work on her voice.
Transitioning, for me, does not imply that I will live the rest of my life looking over my shoulder in some kind of bizarre, semi-constant fear state. While I am not dismissing the propensity for bigoted violence, I'll not be ruled by it either. I hope other people feel the same way. It just strikes me, personally, as counter-intuitive to put forth the time and effort to feel at peace, only to have that peace dominated by constant fear.
QuoteIf you want to live as and be perceived as a woman (which is what "passing" is), then you have an obligation to yourself to work on your voice. The only reason I think people take the stance of "I'm proud of my male voice" is because finding your female voice is hard, it takes work. In our microwave society where everything is instant, working hard on something is not usual. So because people don't want to work on their voice, because it's hard, they say things like "I'm proud of my male voice!" and "The world can deal with it."
Living and being perceived as a woman is not so narrow as I feel you're defining it. I get what you're driving at, and agree to a certain extent, but also feel that there are as many grey areas here as there are individuals and their reasons for going through this process.
QuoteThe world doesn't have to deal with it. It's your problem, not theirs. It's YOUR obligation to conform to the standard image of what a female is to fit into their society, not their obligation to change their standard.
I'm not saying that it's right. I'm saying that this is the way it is, it always has been, and probably always will be.
The only absolute "obligations" I have involve taxes and mortality. You're playing fairly loose with semantics while making some pretty blunt strokes with a one-size-fits-all brush. There are so many potential mitigating factors, unique to each individual, that have the potential to fly in the face of your absolutes it is stunning.
The world
does have to deal with it, at least my corner of the world while I am in it. On my terms as well as their own. How each of us carries ourselves before, during and always is going to be tailored and tempered by where, who and what we are and will absolutely evolve as our experience grows, changes and moves forward.
"Your problem"..."their society".....as if by default, the two are mutually exclusive and we are no longer a part of that same society. By implying that we are not somehow still included in society, that by seeking reconciliation between our inner and outer selves, we've abandoned our rights of inclusion? That is just as bigoted as anything crafted and intentionally aimed to make someone feel "less-than" for walking this path.
I'm sure you did not intend it in such a disparaging and insulting fashion, but these kind of misunderstandings often occur when discussing things people feel strongly about.

Food for thought though, food for thought.
-Miki