That's a very interesting piece, Berkeley girl! Tho there are a couple of things you might bear in mind. First UC Berkeley is 20 places below Cambridge University, my own alma mater, in this American ranking of the world's top colleges ...
http://www.usnews.com/education/worlds-best-universities-rankings/top-400-universities-in-the-worldSorry, couldn't resist that!
And second, while it's absolutely true that women's perception of themselves as what one might call "seen objects" is still absolutely central to their existence, Berger was writing 40 years ago, when the women's movement was till in its relative infancy and before the massive shift in social and economic status towards women in the western world. Simple example: when he wrote Ways of Seeing, women comprised less than 40% of the students at British and US colleges. Now they are more than 60% and are similarly the majority of entrants into, eg, the legal, medical and accounting professions. That makes a HUGE difference to the way they are seen in the world.
All that said, there is absolutely no denying Berger's central point that women are looked at and judged - by one another as much as men - in a completely different way to men. I often wonder whether the sense of being 'clocked', or 'outed' that concerns transitioning MtFs so much may not have nearly as much to do with not passing as they fear, but simply that they are, for the first time in their lives, coming under the scrutiny that women take for granted.
It's also worth noting how strange it is for women when that scrutiny stops as they get older and they become 'invisible'. My mother was an ardent feminist and very successful in her chosen profession. Sh was no fan of wolf-whistling men ... but when she found herself being ignored in the street she was surprised to discove r that it was deeply disturbing to her. She felt like much less of a woman for not being observed ... and I think that experience is quite common.
