Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Kentucky Senate Passes 'License to Discriminate' Bill

Started by stephaniec, March 15, 2016, 10:23:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephaniec

Kentucky Senate Passes 'License to Discriminate' Bill

http://www.advocate.com/politics/2016/3/15/kentucky-senate-passes-license-discriminate-bill

The Advocate/By Sunnivie Brydum March 15 2016 4:58 PM EDT

"Kentucky's Republican-controlled Senate today approved a "license to discriminate" bill that would allow individuals and businesses to deny service to LGBT people without being penalized under local antidiscrimination ordinances.

Senate Bill 180 passed by a vote of 22-16, reports The New Civil Rights Movement. The bill's lead sponsor, Republican Sen. Albert Robinson, contends the proposal is not discriminatory but rather necessary to protect people of faith from LGBT people who "are trying to force their beliefs down the throats" of those who act upon their religious convictions, the site reports. "
  •  

warlockmaker

Hi Stephanie, so what do they consider a post op who has changed their ID?
When we first start our journey the perception and moral values all dramatically change in wonderment. As we evolve further it all becomes normal again but the journey has changed us forever.

SRS January 21st,  2558 (Buddhist calander), 2015
  •  

stephaniec

good question, I don't know  , but I guess if the law acknowledges  the fact that your legally a woman they could still argue their faith says your not.
  •  

April_marrie

  •  

Janine

No matter the fate of this bill, it's a slippery slope. Were people given total freedom to discriminate, it could perhaps lead to the reversal of a century of civil rights battles between three different groups. But if people are mandated to violate what they believe in, it could lead to government effectively mandating the beliefs of the individual, an idea directly contrary to the First Amendment. There is no easy fix here, and its a battle that will likely carry on for a long while.
Am I male? Am I female? I'm just me.
  •  

suzifrommd

Quote from: Janine on March 16, 2016, 03:16:33 PM
There is no easy fix here, and its a battle that will likely carry on for a long while.

Actually, I think there is an easy fix.

If you run a business you do not discrimination. Not on race, not on religion, and not on gender history or presentation.

If it violates your religion to service people in an non-discriminatory manner, don't get a job or start a business where you're required to support people you disapprove of. No one is forcing you to.
Have you read my short story The Eve of Triumph?
  •  

Emileeeee

Quote from: suzifrommd on March 16, 2016, 03:43:36 PM
Actually, I think there is an easy fix.

If you run a business you do not discrimination. Not on race, not on religion, and not on gender history or presentation.

If it violates your religion to service people in an non-discriminatory manner, don't get a job or start a business where you're required to support people you disapprove of. No one is forcing you to.

Yes!
  •  

Devlyn

Bingo, Suzi! If you want to open a business on a public road paid for with everyone's money, you have to serve everyone. End of story.
  •