While science and facts won't win over the hardcore transphobes, they are useful in affecting policy and law. Though this research shows a general parity between cis and trans females, there are significant variations to provide challenges. Different sports and hobbies have different physical needs, and the variation in peoples abilities, both cis and trans, may cause standout performers in some activities. This is where case by case considerations should be followed.
Remember that most of the furore was started when Lia Thomas won the NCAA 500 yard swimming title, but what is never mentioned is that it was during COVID, and most of the top swimmers had stayed away from the competition. With all due respect to Lia, she was never ranked in the top dozen or so female swimmers, and wouldn't have made the finals in a full field of competitors. But the transphobes ignore relative facts, and grab at what supports their phobias.
While in a perfect world, trans women should be allowed to compete in all women's events, the fact is that there is not yet the climate where this can happen. Lia's win did enormous damage to the worldwide trans community, which was unjust, but the reality of what happened.
Remember that most of the world's medical bodies support puberty blockers for trans youth, but despite the dozens of supporting medical papers and organisations, conservatives are advancing bans worldwide. I welcome the BJSM analysis, as this will help to turn the tide, but nowhere near as much as the US Mid Terms can.
Hugs,
Allie