Dear Cindi,
I don't want to harm you nor anybody else, by my postings. Both of us were at the Mormons and both handle differently our experiences. I have studied the Mormons, also the literature of former mormons and scientist who deals with the topic. I see the Mormons very critically, and you presumably don't be so critical. Both is also all right! But I don't find it okay to forbid me my voice! I also have to say much to this topic like you!
For example this here:
Some still to the witnesses of the Book of Mormon. There was three and eight witnesses at once. The three witnesses, David Whitmer, Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris parted all three from him and the Mormons and accused Joseph Smith more differently crimes on. Under this adultery and immoral behavior. Particularly Oliver Cowdery, which was a councellor of Joseph Smith did this. He was later replaced by John C. Bennett, which homosexuality was confessed later. All three said later that they saw the Book of Mormon with "the eyes of the faith". Or they never saw it with their natural eyes but believed what Joseph Smith told to them, expressed differently.
The eight witnesses are:
Christian Whitmer, Jacob Whitmer, Peter Whitmer Jun, John Whitmer, Hiram Page, Joseph Smith Sen., Hyrum Smith und Samuel H. Smith.
Everyone was either related to Joseph Smith or close friends to him. Also they said that they saw the "golden plates" with the "eyes of the faith".
Some of them left the LDS church later and followed mormon sects.
Joseph Smith didn't have the gift of the translation for it; the story already proves alone around the "Kinderhook plates":
Some farmers wanted to show Joseph Smith up; and had plates made of brass which decorated her with characters produced of a blacksmith. They buried the plates, and help a mormon to "found" the plates which claimed that Joseph Smith could translate the plates. Joseph Smith agreed, and said later, that these plates would come from a descendant of Ham(one of the sons Abraham).
The plates had disappeared for decades and were found later. Both scientists , Mormons and non-mormons examined the material and arrived at the conclusion that these plates dated around from the year 1840. The LDS leadership didn't want to believe it first, and then accepted it. They give the secretary of Joseph Smith, William Clayton, the fault now so that their prophet stands innocent!
I think that all of you should know this!
All this information are facts which I have carried from different sources together. Nothing to this is wrong or doubtfully but multiple protected by different statements.
Cindi, I don't find your behave okay, and have to think about it to leave the forum .
Witch of sadness, aka Linda