I'm going to have to pick this apart a bit...
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AM
Basically, to some extent, things like "gay conversion therapy" or "trans conversion therapy" do indeed work for some people; we see examples of this in every 50 year old Trans who was able to happily put off their Identity just by getting married, playing football, and taking pride in "being a man." So we all have to realize that what this means is that some Transsexuals are not as strongly passionate about the sense of Identity as others are;
There is a difference between conversion therapy and survival mechanisms, but I will give you that the two are somewhat related.
Gay/Trans "conversion" therapy revolves around instilling a sense of shame and/or fear in the patient causing the patient to force themselves deep into the closet, so deep they are in a way hiding themselves from themselves.
People do not "happily" put their identity aside, they "fake" it and try to lose themselves in "normal" life just to survive. I know, I was there.
I got married, I had a daughter, I did my best to be what I was supposed to be. And I loved my husband, and my daughter, but all the laughter and hobbies and all that, were done by someone who was little more than a husk. No one knew what I carried within me because I hid it ever so well.
Perhaps those that you've looked at and thought were "happily" setting their identity aside were hiding it just as well, pretending just as well as I was and so on.
This does not mean that we "have to realize" that some transsexuals are not "as passionate about their identity" as others, it means that some of us have been forced into a position where they can't, for any number of reasons, transition, and they're doing whatever they can to make their life bearable with what they have to work with.
I'd advise against presuming you know what goes on within another human beings mind and heart.
You're not psychic.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMquite frankly, the most accurate definition of a Transsexual is someone who wants to commit suicide if they can't realistically live as the desired sex.
No, that's not the "the most accurate definition" of a Transsexual.
That word already has a definition and redefining it to suit your point or beliefs or needs does not make your self-created definition any more accurate than the already defined meaning of the term.
This applies to any term you feel you can define "Better" than it's already defined as.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMIf someone can go out an play football and build birdhouses as a whimsical alternative to having GID, then chances are, they do not have a GID that immediately needs taken care of.
Here's the thing, neither football nor birdhouses have anything to do with being a man or a woman. I've built a birdhouse, I was presenting as a girl at the time but I wasn't the only one building birdhouses. It was a whole class of people, guys and girls, all making birdhouses. No one magically became more or less male for it.
Also, women's football may not be a big thing in the states, but have you seen women's rugby? Seriously! Watch that for 10 minutes and then tell me women can't be brutal!
Secondly, you can't decide to "do" a whimsical "alternative" to "having" a diagnosable condition. Suggesting that one could just go out and do something else would make your condition disappear is incredibly inaccurate at best, dangerously disrespectful at worst. It suggests, in a way, that having GID is a matter of choice. This is incorrect.
How you cope with you GID differs from person to person, and some choices can be made in that matter.
That is all.
Thirdly, just cause a person has found a way to survive that doesn't require "immediate" transition, doesn't give you, or anyone, the right to suggest that their identity is any more or less valid than your's or anyone's.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMFor example, I'm constantly suicidal despite having tried every physical and emotional alternative possible in my many years of living. I have not been in therapy for decades, but I have on my own terms tried absolutely every alternative to identifying as a girl, and I simply can't find a single activity that works for me.
This is "your" experience which you've had as a single human being, not the benchmark to which you should hold all other human beings who's experiences, cultural background, mental status and capacity, personal abilities and disabilities, characteristics and flaws, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, are different from yours.
For example, I'm born and raised in a situation which promoted more gender equality than most of us in this forum have ever experienced and at the same time I've always been rather short on cash. I've had to learn, from birth, that I can do whatever I want that's within my means as well as how to make do with what means I have. Also, I'm a trans man, not a trans woman and I have more support from friends and family than most of us on the forum ever dream to have.
My situation growing up as well as in transition, as well as "now" is a world different from yours, on top of the simple fact that I am not you, and you are not me.
There is no "one size fits all" in these matters.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMMy passion is displaying myself as a girl to the world, to be a girl.
My passion is not displaying myself to the world at all. My passions are art and politics and equality and freedom.
My identity is not my passion, it's the person who has the passions.
My gender is not my passion, its a part of the person who has the passions.
My transition is not my passion, it's what I have to do so that the person with the passions can be whole to pursue them.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMI of coarse have other life goals, but they themselves will only come true if I'm able to identify as being a girl. Elsewise, I think about suicide all the time.
None of my "life goals" depend on me being a bloke, but it helps to be able to be free and whole to be myself in order to have more energy and more "life" to devote to my goals.
For example, I'm a better mother post transition because I'm able to be myself uninterrupted, rather than being this "partially pretend" person who at the same time is trying to raise their daughter to be "herself"... flawed logic is flawed!
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMIt's really the ultimate definition of GID;
Again, GID is already defined.
Running around and redefining it to suit your point or beliefs or needs does not make your self-created definition any more accurate than the already defined meaning of the term.
This applies to any term you feel you can define "Better" than it's already defined as.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMI dare someone to sit here and say that every Transsexual who's committed suicide could have prevented themselves from doing so by going out and building birdhouses or getting a job. It just doesn't happen.
It "could" happen, but I'd be a right jerk to suggest I know what "all" transsexuals should have to do or "be" to deal with their personal lives and personal situations.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMHowever, I value certain steps of transitioning more than others because I know the science behind it.
Science is a word with a specific definition. What science are you referring to? What case studies? What empirical evidence? What research? What peer reviewed research papers?
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMI do know that transsexuals gain the most happiness by first appearing to be a girl by face and clothing standards (which enables them to socially transition) and then to have GRS, which helps them sexually transition.
This can apply to "some" or even "most" but to suggest that it's an empirical "truth" that "all" transsexuals gain the "most" happiness (how do you measure that by the by?) by doing things the way that
you believe they should is just rude.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMAll my patients, if given the choice between looking like a burly man who has a vagina, or looking like a beautiful girl but having a penis, even the most extreme GID cases choose the latter option.
First up, what patients?
Are you practicing any form of medicine without a license? Cause that's very much illegal you know!
Secondly, You can illicit the response you want if you ask the right question in the right manner.
Me, I'm okay with being a burly "man" with a vagina because I'm a man and my penis options are limited.
Similarly, I'm sure many of my women friends, trans or otherwise, would prefer to be "women" with penises to being "men" with vaginas, you know, on account of them being women, not men.
However, to many transsexuals, the dysphoria regarding genitalia is insurmountable and so if they were given the option of "free GRS right now" even if they were otherwise not at all "passing" they would take it. Actually, I think there's a poll on the matter somewhere, just look around the forums and you'll find it, sooner or later.
Also, the choice may be about avoiding pain. See, transsexuals are a marginalized group. So marginalized in fact that being visually identifiable as trans may cause you to be attacked verbally or even physically.
As such, the issue of passing may be important to many trans persons as a means to avoid being singled out and attacked. This also explains the desire for "stealth" in my mind.
Quote from: RhinoP on July 17, 2011, 01:59:27 AMGID is about physical appearance as much as it is genitalia.
"For you."
Maybe not for me.
Maybe not for the person sitting next to you.
Try and speak for yourself, not others.