(Late reply, this is not very fun to talk about. Should have said things sooner. Probably should not be bumping this thread.)
Quote from: insideontheoutside on December 28, 2013, 04:23:50 PM
I can actually really relate to what you're talking about here and it's kind of a whole other thing. I've had experiences where people try to physically "expose" me or get me to just "be ok" with everything just like that. If you want to continue that thread of the discussion at all off this post, feel free to pm me.
Thank you. I appreciate your willingness to discuss uncomfortable aspects of life with this condition...heck, I can barely think about most of it. I may or may not PM, but I am appreciative of this.
Quote from: caleb. on December 28, 2013, 04:36:00 PM
From what you said, it seems these are people in the trans community or who claim to be trans allies (with the whole, it's ok to have a vagina thing, no one cares) - imo these types of people, especially when they go to the level of pantsing you, are just toxic and clearly have no idea of what dysphoria entails.
Yup. This is why I'm hesitant to, and somewhat bitter about, going into great detail concerning this topic. My emotional nuance ability is shutting down as I type, fyi, if I think about it too much I will lapse into the clinical language which tends to be misconstrued. This "toxic" (as you put it) behavior has come from mostly either people in/affiliated with the trans community, or the uber-feminist sex-positive love-your-vagina crowd who equate discomfort with one's body parts with sexism. I did not dislike the vagina because vagina coded female and female coded inferior. "Dislike" wasn't the right word. Instead, a sense of "this does not belong on me" due to the aforementioned body map. It's all body map, for me. It's got nothing to do with the external perception of anyone, or any ideas of mine about gender.
Quote from: caleb. on December 28, 2013, 04:36:00 PM
Have you ever considered just not worrying about body language?
Yes. I also live in a part of Ohio where it's likely to get me killed or beaten if I'm not some combination of incredibly ruthless, potentially violently psychotic, a Bruce Lee Jeet Kun Do martial arts badarse mofo, and/or a gun owner. It got me run out of the town where I was going to college, and those jerks followed me home for a second helping of cruelty. I'm alive because I'm very good at evasion and disappearing.
Quote..are you happy with T?
Don't get me started on this. Not mad at you, but if I start, I'm not going to stop. No, I'm not "happy on T," but what do you mean by "happy" and what form of T are you talking about? I've had issues with T, and it's been a miserable time, going on and off because I had to, though BTW I am on it right now, a daily dose of topical because everything else turns horrible almost instantaneously. That does not somehow indicate that I am "actually not trans" or whatever. T is not magic. T is not special occulted boy-juice that proves who knows what is best for them. T is not fun. Puberty is GRUELING. But it makes my chest hair grow, and my beard grow, and my parts grow. It makes my voice deepen, not enough for my comfort, but slowly and surely. I'm just as grouchy and surly as I was before. Emotionally I am the same on T as off T, maybe twitchier but that's it. It feels the same as the first run of puberty, except this time I'm not getting the bleeds. This not joy, this is not rapture, this is not "the right fuel for my engine," (and they call me essentialist,) this is welcome back to the beautiful hell called physical maturation. Some good, some bad, all completely insane...insane in a neutral way.
Quote from: FA on December 28, 2013, 06:32:56 PM
But you aren't like those cis people because otherwise it wouldn't be a big deal to you what genitals you had.
But if I had been born with the right set I would be like those cis people.
QuoteAre these former 'friends' radical feminists? (not to malign radical feminists)
To repeat myself--they were pretty far from it, by most definitions. Unless you include sex-positive hipster ideological "gender rebel" feminists in your definition of radfems. (A lot of their so-called feminism boiled down to "anything that society calls masculine is wrong and bad, even if you don't define it as masculine but just how you are personally," for starters.)
QuoteWhy do you think you feel the way you do about your genitals if you don't have any ties to being male? What other physical aspects do you care about? Have you had or are you planning a full medical transition? Based on your statement in the other thread - why do you agree that genitals make the man if you don't feel you have a gender identity yet want a penis?
The phrasing of this question is slightly unnerving, i.e, "why do you think you feel xyz," implication being that I only *think* I feel a certain way and there's no possible sane way I could honestly feel like this because it doesn't fit a paradigm. I may be reading too much into this, I'm not sure if I am being oversensitive or not.
Why do I
feel this way (and not just
think I feel?) Because, as I've said before, neurological body map is neurological body map. My "ties to being male" begin and end with the body type that the word "male" usually pertains to. Because that is how I see myself and everyone. What other physical aspects do I care about? This is a loaded question and I can't answer it without anger about "cis-centrism" and attribution of psychological motives getting in the way. Yes, I am planning on a full medical transition. I do not agree that genitals make the "man," because I don't think there is such thing, but I do agree that genitals make the male, because genitals are the only reason the concept of "male" exists, and "male" means nothing aside from genitals and a degree of variation on the theme of other body characteristics. Everything else is society's sexism and personal preference that society has wrangled and shoehorned into sexist concepts.
So it's wrong to genital essentialize, but perfectly fine to gender essentialize? This is why I'm uncomfortable with framing things in terms of "gender identity." The entire concept seems incredibly sexist to me--sexist against men and women alike. The concepts of "masculine" and "feminine" are sexist to me as well. I have mostly traits that society would call "masculine." I'm not comfortable with defining them as "masculine" or "male," though. They're mine, they're the way I happen to be, what I happen to prefer and it's got nothing to do with my sense of what my body should be or any investment in the concept of "man." If I didn't have the bodily sense that I did I would have been a girl or a woman with the same set of interests and preferences. I can't live with myself redefining traits that are personal into some gendered box, even if society does. This is my main problem with any kind of gender socialization, because they take personal preferences and attribute them, with a smarmy wink-wink attitude, to the concept of "man" or "woman." It's slimy and uncomfortable to have my personal preferences taken out of "me" and stuck in this box of "dude." No I am NOT a "total dude" because I love beer and action movies and running around in the mud and I tend to sprawl my legs when I sit. What about all the male people who aren't like this? What about all the female people who are like this? I would have BEEN one of the "female people who are like this," except for the whole issue of...
"My sense of my body is set up inside in a way that happens to map to a body type that is called male by its characteristics, as opposed to female and I don't know why. Go figure. If it is not surgically correctable, then I have to learn to live with it--oh wait, it's medically possible to correct these physical anomalies? Can I stay the same in terms of personality? Then sign me up! Oh wait, there are all these different social norms and everyone is responding to me differently just because I'm doing this and expecting different things of me. That sucks. That makes me mad. Meanwhile, I'm trying to sort out other issues, such as past trauma from bullying and forced psychiatric medication, and trying to avoid harassment in the present day for a medical condition I can't help, so I'll forget about it for now."
Also, I do not retract the statement that I made, of "so what if they still think of me as a girl?" Because it still doesn't matter. They can think whatever they want, because the term is meaningless to me. If it looks like a penis, erects like a penis, does other things like a penis, you can call it whatever you want but it's still a penis and there is a difference between it and a clitoris, or even a penis with a vagina underneath. Until then, I keep my pants on around other people. Probably after then, too. Afterward would be less awkward and lead to less awkward conversations. So they can insist on calling it a gigantic clitoris with a line of scar tissue where a vagina would be, and these lumpy formerly-labia flesh-bulbs underneath it that it sits on, with a urethra on the end that I pee through, whatev, fine then, it's the strangest clitoris I've ever heard of--but there's no denying it's not in the same category as any other clitoris they're likely to have seen. Because at the end of the day it is not, in fact, a clitoris, but a penis and no amount of linguistics or denial is going to undo that.