Quote from: Amy T. on August 16, 2007, 02:45:03 AM
... I don't know why, but in some ways I found the original post a bit...insulting. Its the type of thing that is written at a transperson, be it man or woman, that is completely disconnected from what its like and why things are sometimes said. It seems like something typically written by the spouse of a trans person, who thinks they know something, but are often missing out on quite a bit of context or real understanding. We have heard this all before, and honestly it comes off as speaking down to us, and generally speaking, insulting. The only reason I say this is because I have seen it dozens of times before. It is almost always used to degrade or insult trans people in some way. I would not go to far to call it borderline trolling.
Next time you want to post something on a transboard like this, read Julia Serano's Whipping Girl. Because honestly, some of us can read subtexts of posts, myself included. There are quite a few generalizations in this post without really quite understanding the cultural context or the history (both personal and community) of trans people. It is quite a bit of the same crap that has been thrown at us for years, and to be honest, we are sick of hearing it.
The truth is transwomen get so much of this crap, it begins to grind on us. So we have every right to call it for what it is: insulting.
Passing is a safety issue first and foremost with most transwomen. ... But the truth is, it often comes off as degrading or insulting...and I definitely see that to be the case here. We are still adults, even though we may have new stuff we have to learn. Please treat us as such.
And in the future...keep posts like this that lecture us off transboards. We have heard it all before.
The essence of womanhood...I am sorry, but is not there just the essence of being at peace and being human enough. And living life as one sees fit, without being lectured for who we are and what we have to do to obtain peace.
Everybody is different. Leave them be, and please don't post these things on transsexual boards.
Your essay could be seen as being quite true by many of the readers here. Perhaps they regard any criticism as being a net negative.
After years of living with this, I do not choose to see it as either trolling or talking down. I regard it as an expression of my view. If it clashes with yours, that is fine with me. But, the pov expressed is one from a member that I would expect you view as trans.
To live a stereotype and to find in that safety is a bit like finding safety in hiding in the grass. That is fine for a grasshopper, less fine for a water buffalo. The water buffalo is likely to be found. The grasshopper not so much.
My essay was not a trolling expedition. It was and is a pov.
Women are women. There are all different types, Amy. My type is not of the Reagan sort that demands never criticizing what seems harmful to me, even if it comes from one of my own. After all, none of us, I am sure, wish to see even one more girl murdered or beaten. I am sure none of us wants to see another woman raped.
Exactly where does one find a view that walks awry of the party line and expresses that if not on a trans board? Perhaps I should have placed this on a Neo-con board, so it would have resonated with all of the audience? But, would many of them see the difficulties that younger and newer transitioners do or will face? Thus, I believe a trans board is absolutely the right place for a different pov.
I appreciate the right of people to be and act in ways that accord with who they find themselves to be. But, where rubber meets the road to match oneself to a stereotype is an impossibility. The struggles of some to find their place within their gender can be awesomely difficult. I accept that.
Perhaps, it is not out-of-line to point out a few pitfalls.
As for not posting TS-related thoughts and opinions on trans boards: must we now all read from the same version of the Bible? Who will write the Bible? Who will be willing to decide that she or he has the pathway that fits all?
Like any group of people TS people are various.If someone is comfortable being June Cleaver, then more power to her. She or another she or he have every right.
If I were to be a trans-activist I think I would have to do my best to represent all of the spectrum of people and not insist that only certain povs are acceptable. That seems like a much better exercise than does a constant winnowing of what we can and cannot say.
My original post did not insist that anyone agree with me at all. Nor do I insist that you agree. My rant was just that. I went through pretty much every one of the false, imo, poses I presented when I began. I found that to lead my life I needed to get away from the stereotypes. Not at first, but if I wished to lead a womanly life. I do not think I deserve a lecture anymore than you think others do.
There was plenty of warning to begin with. The pov is mine. I was a transsexual at a period of time in my life. I am no longer. If your comfort is elsewhere, that is fine with me.
But to have my pov dismissed as trolling and harmful? I rather think not.
Imo, the ability of trans-people to live abundant lives, and to find each her or his own place within the culture we abide in, is a right afforded to each of us. To only have people posting on this or any other board if they only have a
particular pov seems to me to be inimical to the quest for being seen by others as being simply a part of the natural experience of humanity in all of its diverse ranges.
That post was not directed at any one, maybe even any, individual I have read here. It was directed at what I see as a very harmful and dangerous way of viewing transition. A way to make sure that the boldest question a Larry King can ask of a trans-woman is whether or not she sits to pee. Thus far, that is the very real fact of activism over the past twenty years. Larry now perceives us all as being unable to sit and pee.
That progress seems to me to be minimal. Perhaps he does allow one of us to come on his show, but when he begins to see us as women and talks to us as such, then progress will have reached a stage where one can, imo, say it has been meaningful progress. I doubt that will come by all of us adhering to a one right way concept of talking among ourselves. If we plan to use the divesity of life as a means of effecting changes in perception from among the nons, I believe that we should present the nons with people of whom they can realize:
Hey, that guy is really a guy. That woman is really a woman.That will not happen when we insist that for the good of the Movement that no criticism should be broached among ourselves. The portion of your post I highlighted i find terribly much out-of-step with the view you were seeming to present.
Best wishes in all of your endeavors,
Nichole
Edited to add: btw, I have read all of Julia Serano I can get my hands on. Including interviews. I have never noticed, however, that she will not say things that might be less than critical of women who were/are trans.