Quote from: lisagurl on January 25, 2010, 05:11:12 PM
Freedom and liberty require no laws to inhibit how a person wants to live. It is not freedom when the government dictates the conditions.
No, that's a nonsense, simply because it is unrealisable except on an Island with one person. (Even then it's debatable).
Freedom means that such restrictions as exist are based upon demonstrable social need and not dogma.
We restrict assault, theft and so on. We restrict certain types of relationships, especially concerning children, close relations, non-humans.
These and some others are demonstrable.
Some may attempt to justify restrictions based upon percieved association. There is a link in the News section to a newspaper article which makes a point of highlighting the crossdressing habits of some guy convicted of sexually assaulting some children.
https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,71023.0.htmlThere is a long held belief, that was fairly prevalent when I was young, that all deviation form sexual norms were linked. So, someone indulging in homosexual behaviour was equally likely to fancy a spot of beastiality.
But these notions are a demonstrable nonsense.
Society, especially in socialist Kingdoms, is removing restrictions on behavaviour and lifestyle where these have no other bearing on society.
There is not and shouldn't be, any restrictions on relationships between people of the same sex for example.
The problems that remain in socialist Kingdoms are social acceptance. These problems exist in all societies. But it would seem that only in non-socialist republics can someone attempt to attract political attention, by promising to effectively legalise physical assaults on gay children.
https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,71455.0.html