(I found this just now

)
Save the chickens (from hell)
Animal rights activists are trying to save chickens from hell.
Hell, as you may have suspected, is in South Carolina.
More specifically, it's on a chicken farm operated by monks, according to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
PETA claims the monks of Mepkin Abbey were operating some kind of egg-laying sweatshop. It says thousands of poor hens were crammed into small cages and periodically starved.
While starving certainly sounds unpleasant, a "brother" who appeared on a secretly taped PETA video compared it to fasting.
Fasting means to abstain from food, often in observance of a holy day. This, of course, is highly irregular behavior for a chicken.
While fasting can serve as an impetus for a deep spiritual experience, it apparently has the added benefit of causing hens to lay more eggs.
But the abbey chickens were allegedly forced to observe this religious practice rather than participating of their own free will.
While this may cross some ethical line in the land of religious freedom, it doesn't actually kill the chicken. And you know the ancient Chinese proverb: "That which does not kill the chicken, makes the chicken stronger."
The alleged sins of these monks pall in comparison to certain other religious groups in the South, who are said to actually roll the chickens in batter and fry them — all without the birds' permission.
It's only a matter of time before PETA tries to videotape this Wednesday-night practice of forced chicken sacrifice.
I could speak more on this matter, but my membership in a secret fried-chicken sect requires a vow of silence. I can add, however, that it involves no fasting on the part of either the chicken or the brethren.
Meanwhile back at the hen house, the Trappist monks of South Carolina deny that they are mistreating their chickens.
"They are very hurt by all this," abbey spokeswoman Mary Jeffcoat said of the monks.
Maybe it's time for the two groups to meet in an ecumenical dialogue. Perhaps they could begin by agreeing that hell is no place for man nor chicken. 
from another forum, the same topic:
What the hell?This astonishing piece of heresy can in no way be justified:
"I just don't respect chickens very much. I don't consider them to be individuals who can have meaningful preferences about their own futures. A chicken has preferences about the here and now, but it doesn't have preferences about its future existence. A chicken isn't capable of conceiving of itself as a self over time. So, as long as the chicken doesn't suffer, it can't matter to the chicken whether it has a long life or a short one."
This scurrilous bit of anti-chickenhood must be squashed immediately. Death to all who differ! Death! Death! Death!
Posted by Heidi at January 17, 2006 10:29 PMIsn't capable or chooses not to conceive of itself? The buddhist finds only burden in the pondering of his/her past or future. So something or someone that can live with such peace and happiness should be respected by all. And jesus do they taste good.
Posted by: Brandon at January 19, 2006 10:19 PMyeah, well, I am easily amused. Not as easily as a chicken, maybe, but...
what hey, this just in, from the Wiki entry,
Diyu(Part of a series on
Hell / Underworld)
Diyu (Traditional Chinese: 地獄; Simplified Chinese: 地狱; Hanyu Pinyin: Dìyù; Wade-Giles: Ti-yü; Japanese: 地獄, jigoku, literally "earth prison") is the realm of the dead or "hell" in Chinese mythology.
"... terminologies related to hell:
油鍋 -
the deep frying wok, one of the tortures in hell."
* * *
Well I don't wanna be no chicken (I been thru there and done that, and now it's time to break that yoke/yolk), and they say you are what you eat, so...
I DONNO....

tmcw