Quote from: DCQ on December 25, 2013, 09:21:23 PM
Yeah, sounds like Asperger's to me. I have Asperger's too, and it can be hard to read social cues, but that's not an excuse to be a jerk. Nobody likes being treated badly; you don't have to guess in that case.
I don't think it's Asperger's, because I'm capable of reading the body language and implicit communications if I make an effort--hence the comment about ability to mimic--but I don't implicitly share the emotional attachment and amount of importance(?) most seem to ascribe to it. Not an issue of knowing what or how, but why and why
this? Keeping track of non-verbal, gestural, meta-communication type things and formulating the proper response to being gestured and implicit-statemented and body-languaged at is strenuous. Depersonalization/derealization describes it better, rather than a lack of ability it's a disconnect. I might have Schizoid and/or Schizotypal PD. I've been this way for most of my life, just didn't know how to explain it or that it would cause difficulties as an adult.
Five words in the wrong context were that incredibly hurtful. I know, people have feelings that aren't mine and right to be upset. The thread was the second result that showed up on a search engine, I didn't go digging for it. I typed and posted five words and it was a big thing. I wasn't even angry about anything, at anyone, and was barely aware that it would be Christmas in a few days. I knew some might get mad, because a lot of people have very strong opinions on the subject, but I underestimated the degree to which the statement would be upsetting.
Quote from: insideontheoutside on December 25, 2013, 09:54:47 PM
I'm just curious ... so do you actually still consider yourself female since you don't have all the surgeries yet? And if so, do you consider what you're doing up to the time that you get the final surgery, an "act" in a way?
Technically yes, I consider myself female by default, in the situations where it would apply (i.e, being pantsless in front of other people, which I go out of my way to avoid so they don't see that I'm still female down there,) though less so than before the other surgeries. I consider everything I do, everything I have done and everything I will do socially an "act" because reality and communication and gestures and any/every social role, gendered or not, feels like one. Derealization/depersonalization and an inherent disconnect from the shared importance of certain stuff people around me have. I wasn't implying that gendered mannerisms/presentation/performance/roles are "fake-unless," or less genuine than when cis people do them. It all seems like a bunch of actors milling around on stage acting and being bizarre, no matter who's doing it or what variation of it they're doing.
QuoteFurther in your post you talk about being a mimic of mannerisms, etc. But that is an act as well, technically. You're not really being yourself when you're trying to copy what other people are doing.
From my observations just on this board, it seems a lot of male trans people go one of two ways ... either they're like myself and they just are the way they are and that just happens to be "male" on the mannerisms, how you carry yourself in society, etc. or you were heavily influenced (and confused) by your original socialization as "female" and have a hard time navigating as male in society because of that. You mention that, in addition, you can't figure out body language, so for you personally that's also going to come into play.
There wasn't any original socialization. People must have tried, and I tried, but it didn't stick. Trying to teach myself female mannerisms or pick them up from other people felt the same then as it does now--disjointed, disconnected, a struggle to maintain or even find any value in, beyond "not getting yelled at by people who expect you to do these things," and even that wasn't good enough after a while. The only way I was able to deal with social situations and go from complete train wreck to...partial train wreck, was by inventing a character who was clearly, in my mind, a fictional character, and being that person. Nobody seemed to notice, or react to me as though I was being less "real," so I came to the conclusion that it's what everyone did and I'd just figured it out. It turns out I was wrong and people do have a genuine sense of an internal immutable thing that they are driving their actions, and that their actions are the logical outcomes/manifestations of the core self-ness they feel. My sense of self is a conglomeration of patterns of preferences and tendencies that don't have anything to do with anyone or anything else, and exist arbitrarily to form this entity I perceive as "me" because...that's what fell from the primordial void, ask a trilobite why it's a trilobite and it wouldn't understand, it would keep trilobiting along. These patterns also don't have any natural outward manifestation that is consistent from day to day, situation to situation. There is no body language that instinctively emanates from, or instinctively expresses, these patterns-that-comprise-internal-me. If I wanted one, I had to invent one.
If I set aside five minutes in which to demonstrate what it looked like when I was not doing anything that felt like acting or mimicry, those five minutes would be spent sitting in a catatonic daze staring at a wall and not moving. Is that the "real me?" If no actions come naturally to me, not even the simplest ones, does this mean I have no self and there is no real me?
I don't think that's what you're implying, but if you are it's incorrect, there is clearly a "me" in there, but it doesn't seem to be made of, centered around, or reactive to, the same stuff as others' is, going on others' descriptions of identity--not just gender identity but identity, period.
QuoteI've noticed in some of your other posts you mention how well you pass. So you don't seem to have the problem of people not taking you as male by appearance alone. Honestly it does sound more like an issue with just the way you're thinking about stuff. Sure there's those stereotypical male mannerisms and "ways to be a man", but not even all the cis males out there fit into those boxes. And i've talked to plenty who also put on an "act" when it comes to certain things (I know a hell of a lot of men who fake liking sports because they think other men will give them sh*t about not liking sports, for instance). I guess it's human nature to just want to feel accepted by "the group" – whatever that group may be. But what it really comes down to, is your own happiness and comfort level. Are you happy/comfortable putting on an act? Yes? Good, do it. No? Bad, don't do it.
The degree to which almost all of daily functional life feels like "putting on a performance" makes my happiness and comfort an irrelevant factor. There are stereotypical male mannerisms, and then there are appropriate mannerisms for anything at all. There's stereotypical masculine clothing, and then there's doing laundry and wearing clothes. There's short hair, there's long hair, and there's bathing every week. None of it makes me happy or comfortable, aside from a vague sense of accomplishment that I got a chore done and I don't have to anymore, and a sense of, "this is my pantomime of a normal person with basic functional life skills." I could decide, "not happy/comfortable putting on this act. Bad. Not doing it." I could. But then, the act I'm putting on is commonly known as hygiene.
QuoteAnd there's so many various ways to "be a man" but you have to be your own man.
The way I'm thinking about stuff is probably tripping me up, you were right, but in a different way. People recommend and advise transitioners to "go with what feels natural," "trust your instincts," "unlearn the unwanted socialization and the real you is what's underneath," and this is good advice, some of the best advice. I don't have any instincts to trust, though. It's all cognitive. I was getting confused by the supposed lack of honesty my detachment and maybe-schizoid tendencies connoted, digging for a felt authenticity in basic behavior that I don't have and never had. I should have realized that it's all going to feel like acting anyway, and in a weird way it's freedom because it would mean I can choose, I could be in near-complete control of who I am to other people, I could get out there, play the part and nail it, no hesitation. I could be anyone I wanted, if I wanted.
And that scares me. It's like being commanded to prove I exist. I could only say that I do and don't at the same time, if it's anything it's nothing, or is it, and then what?
On a different subject, I've got this body I move around in.
QuoteCircling back to the penis thing. I get what you're saying. I'm not transitioning, but I don't consider myself female either. However, I know that I will never have the perfect looking, fully functional penis that my mind thinks I have already. That's just how my brain is set up though. Maybe it's like those guys who have an unfortunate accident and lose all/part of their penis? All I know is that I didn't come into this world with a fully female brain. And I've had to deal with the reality of missing or added parts in my own way. I tried other people's ways of dealing with it, and it didn't work. But I'm certainly not going to compromise on who I am with myself (and some very close friends), and I'm done with trying to act some sort of role out for society. If people want to refer to me as a "masculine woman", whatever. They're wrong, of course, although they may never know that, but I do and that's what matters most to me.
I've been told (by so-called "professionals" no less) that I can't possible be male because I'm not even willing to do "treatment" (transition). For a long time that stayed with me and made my resentment of my physical body (and half of society) even worse. It wasn't until I had sorted some things out on my own and basically just had a, screw it, I'm just going to be myself regardless, moment, that things started looking up for me in that area. I think you need to sort through some things yourself and also realize that projecting your own opinions on others and/or holding them up to your definitions doesn't really help you at all.
You're right, I shouldn't have been telling other people who they were and weren't. From what I gather in the quote above, you conflate things that I don't, and don't conflate things that I do. Where you place the boundaries of your categories is not where I place them. That does not give me an excuse to walk in and start yelling about how I'm right and everyone is wrong. But repeating myself, I focus on my rigid either-or body category based view of the world because it's something solid and concrete and relatively simplistic to anchor my comprehension of existence with. It is comforting, to me. But that does not give me an excuse to dump it on other people.
Said what I meant already about the "being myself" thing, why I can't work on that premise, how there is no "myself" that doesn't feel like acting and there never was, etc.
No, it did help, because I had to think about stuff, even though I upset people, so in the future I won't upset as many people.