Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Rash feelings with non-transsexual transgendered people?

Started by Gracie Faise, July 31, 2008, 09:29:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gracie Faise

Okay so, I've been having a conflict in feelings lately. I've been having trouble sorting things out in my head, so if a few of my statements are contradictory, that is why. I don't know whether this belongs here or the edge too, so move it if necessary...


I dislike being considered as/grouped with non-transsexual transgendered people.
Basically: Cross dressers and ->-bleeped-<-s. I feel... demeaned or insulted when someone says "transgendered" when they mean "transsexualism." Now, I'm not saying I dislike them. I'm not stating any prejudices or trying to belittle them. I just don't like being told or described (whether directly, indirectly, knowingly, or unknowingly) as being on the same level as them.

I just feel that, even though we have similar struggles, I'm just from a completely different universe with all of it. It's a physiological thing for me, and to be called the same thing as someone who gender bends for sexual/recreational purposes makes me feel misunderstood and anguished and even a little upset/angry.

But the thing is is it makes me feel terrible that I have such negative, perhaps even grudgingly negative feelings towards people that seem so nice and friendly at my support groups. Why? I'm upset with the people that tell me I'm the same, not non-transsexual transgendered people themselves!

I do hold some sympathetic feelings for HBS views, and agree with some of their less discriminatory policies and goals. I don't know if these feelings are just the beginnings of some very aggressive feelings that I see in a lot of people that consider themselves HBSers or if they're just isolated frustrations/confusions I need to work out.



If I could hear others opinions about this maybe I could figure some stuff out about what I'm really feelings.
  •  

tekla

I suppose that could cut both ways, as sharp edges often do.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

IsabelleStPierre

Greetings,

Hum, I would have to admit that I too sometime have similar feelings on this topic. When ever I hear the argument when gender identity is added to some city's anti-discrimination law about...well...then that means any man in a dress can enter a womans bathroom! Oh give me a break already, they are lumping transsexuals in the cross-dresser category and simply have no idea what they are talking about; just drives me absolutely crazy...hum...did I miss my E shot this week???

One of the problems is the term transgender in and of itself. The term is an umbrella term, but people fail to recognize all of the categories that make up that umbrella and use the word in the wrong context. This is an education problem and one of the reason why the general public still needs to be educated about trans issues, what it means to be trans, etc. But at the same time, a lot of transsexuals went through a cross-dressing phase before realizing that things went much deeper then simply having a desire to dress as the opposite sex; so for some cross-dressers it is also a physiological thing too.

I don't think you are alone in your feelings...
  •  

Purple Pimp

But why should it feel demeaning?

I understand that there are plenty of straight, misogynistic guys out there who dress up like girls because it humiliates them and therefore excites them sexually.  They're caught up in the same gender trap system that we all are which equates femaleness with "bad."

I'm not saying that I'd like to necessarily hang out with a group of "sissies," but I think splitting off into tinier and tinier groups doesn't bring about societal change.  When we work to decrease misogyny in society as much as possible, there will not be a class of people who are sexually excited from being "girls."

Just my, very humble, opinion.  I could be wrong.

Lia
First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you would do. -- Epictetus
  •  

tisha

Gracie, I must say that in many ways I agree with you. I get so sick of being judged in an incorrect way. Some people in the world have no clue as to what "transgendered" or "Transexual" means.  All they think of is what they saw in Rocky Horror Picture Show.  The world can be so cruel and mean too.  I think for the most part though I have taken all the pain I have felt over the years and put it to changing  myself. Some of the time I have the attitude that the world can kiss my *** ! But then other times I'm so very concerned about how people view me.
  •  

Alicia Marie

  From a straight guy's point of view the porn industry and being under the GLBT umbrella has done the most harm in tainting views about good, honest and moral transsexuals.
  The straight guys I know are repulsed by homosexual sexual activity between two men.
  Transsexuals and transgenders have no distinction between them. To them they are just effeminate sissies.
  That is why I think there should be a distinction between transsexual and transgender and even being sperate from the GLB.
  There are still a lot of uninformed folk out there. For some the closest they will ever come to understanding a transsexual is a porn movie and that just ought not to be.
  Sadly, many will just continue to lump them with the GLB and they will be nothing more than vile perverted people that they will continue to hate.
  I agree with the transsexuals that want a distinction from being lumped with transgenders.
  I personally think it should go one step farther and come out of the GLBT umbrella.
  But, that's just a straight and little informed opinion.
  If I offended anyone, please forgive me.
  Alicia
  •  

sarahb

Quote from: Purple Pimp on July 31, 2008, 10:19:25 PM
...but I think splitting off into tinier and tinier groups doesn't bring about societal change.

I agree. I myself am still confused when I look at all the categories to describe the different degrees of gender/sexual variances, CD, TS, TV, Androgyn, etc, etc. I think that it's easier for people who can't understand to just group all of the "variant" people together and go from there. I don't think this is a bad thing, however. I wonder what it would have been like if this whole time it was always considered LGBT instead of just LGB...would we be in the same position as our gay and lesbian counterparts are today? Often you hear that we are "where they were 20 years ago." If we started way back when trying to get the same benefits and understanding for everyone who is "variant" then the world would be very different.

In my opinion, if it makes it easy for others to understand it, and they happen to group us all together, let them, so long as they accept the fact that we all need the same protections, standards, and rights given to everyone else. As we can see, fighting for one group at a time just makes it a more prolonged process to get adequate rights for everyone.

Quote from: Alicia Marie on July 31, 2008, 11:47:17 PM
  The straight guys I know are repulsed by homosexual sexual activity between two men.
  Transsexuals and transgenders have no distinction between them. To them they are just effeminate sissies.

As far as this is concerned, I don't believe people who have this mentality will ever accept us anyways, no matter if we're "classified" under a different heading or not.
  •  

Caroline

Quote from: Isabelle St-Pierre on July 31, 2008, 09:46:50 PM
One of the problems is the term transgender in and of itself. The term is an umbrella term, but people fail to recognize all of the categories that make up that umbrella and use the word in the wrong context. This is an education problem and one of the reason why the general public still needs to be educated about trans issues, what it means to be trans, etc.

Indeed.  I don't like the term transgender much and avoid using it to refer to myself.  The problem with it when applied to people who don't identify as the gender assigned to them at birth is fairly easy to demonstrate:  To the general populace, a m2f transsexual and a male crossdresser wearing a dress are both exhibiting 'transgender behaviour'.  To somebody who understands what transsexuality is, a man wearing a dress is indeed exhibiting 'transgender behaviour', however a m2f transsexual wearing a dress is just a woman wearing a dress.  She would be exhibiting 'transgender behaviour' if she decided to go out in a men's shirt and tie!

  •  

NicholeW.

Cindy BC, an interesting idea, a mod's suggesting a transfer of forum without doing that themself, or leaving a report? That doesn't happen often.

Personally, I'd say the conversation is pretty much fine where it is, as this way a group of people can discuss it and it doesn't become another "hidden" conversation.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gracie, you are not the only one. Surely there are a lot of women and men who probably feel about the same. I think especially women who have been alienated by choice from the gay-life prior to transition. There can be a lot of embarrassment it seems among some over just that.   

QuoteI dislike being considered as/grouped with non-transsexual transgendered people.

I think this is pretty universal. There are times when each of us don't like such groupings. For instance a lot of second-wave feminists felt uncomfortable being grouped with poor, black and lesbian women. All those others made a lot of them feel like people would "get the wrong idea" about them. So, for a good while there were arguments through the late 60s about inclusion and exile. Some of them continue today.

I have this notion that people who are different can still care for, support, and work together one with another.

I mean, do I want to be thought of as a sex-worker because I transitioned? No. But do other woman like me do sex-work? Yep. So we are different, but just how different?

Other people cross-dress. They don't appear to be transitioning, but some who start as cross-dressers later discover that that isn't "enough." They begin transition in earnest and wind up getting surgeries.

There are some women and men who are don't complete all surgeries. OK, that makes them different from those of us who do, but how different?

Andra completed surgery, but is Andra like Lia who also completed surgery? I think they have lots in common, but the identifications they have are different, except as post-ops. So, it seems to me that there is always a variety.

Do we shun people because they are different? African-American and Latina women certainly have a different up-bringing, different ways they have walked through the world from me. But, do those things separate us into three entirely different groups? Maybe to some extent, I suppose that depends on us. But, I'd imagine we are more alike than different.

I have to admit that for me women's issues are more the focus of my life than are "trans" issues or LTBG issues. But, I have an interest in all three and all three do, in some ways, impact my life.

I cannot sort your feelings for you, not that you've asked, :) but I can tell you I have been where you are. In fact, I've been somewhere to the far-side of Cindy BC in my views.

Butcha know? Actually getting to know people who aren't like me in every way has also changed a lot of my earlier views. That's made it much harder for me to maintain a concrete political/social/philosophical wall in my mind and heart between all of our different groups.

I have to admit I also have some reservations about "Transgendered," but I have no reservations about being able to align myself and be friends with people who aren't like me. I don't want to see them unprotected, disenfranchised and exiled just so other people can tell the difference between me and them. That just doesn't ring true for me either.

Nor can I agree with Alicia Marie. Ya see, the way the cissexuals/cisgendered people view us all as the same is their difficulty. I am under no obligation to alleviate their prejudices. They need to do that for themselves by doing something like what I have done. Actually getting to know people who they are currently afraid of. I cannot relieve their prejudices and fears.

No amount of me distancing myself from another is going to show still others that I am somehow different. Those beliefs are their own. The only things that ever make a difference for the prejudiced is actually getting to know and integrate themselves with others. It becomes so much harder then to make blanket statements about any other group. Because, as you see in your support group -- they may be different, but you also find ones that you like and care for. Others, perhaps not so much.

And you also notice that some people always hold onto "philosophical" arguments about difference and sameness no matter what. For them the idea seems more important, I suppose, than what they actually come to discover. Is an idea more important than a person? For me that's the core of this entire discussion. I vote that people are more important than ideas, so, I am willing and able to support transgendered people and number myself among them.

Your choice is your choice, luv. Your comfort is your comfort and only you can reach that. Making a decision like that one way or another doesn't make you a "bad person;" although I have to admit that when I have doubts like that, I sorta think I should try to figure out why I think they are "bad," ya know?

Use your heart and your mind. I think that even if you find that you should separate yourself from crossdressers, genderqueers and even from transsexuals that are not like you, you don't have to be a bad person. You don't have to value yourself at the expense of another. You just recognize a difference.

I recognize difference, but like Lia said, I also recognize similarities, especially in the way many cises perceive and think about us all. Smaller and smaller well-defined and segregated groups when altogether we are probably less than or equal to about 1% or so of the population isn't a great idea. But, that I feel is a practicality. The more allies and fellow-travelers a very small group has, the better chance that that group survives and thrives in a milieu that is decidedly hostile in many respects.

It's a good question and definitely good that you have some ambivalence about how you feel. Ambivalence is usually the first sign that there is something there the person hasn't come to a wholy comfortable place in their life about. Work with that, feel yourself and question yourself. I think you'll discover a place you can comfortably live.


:icon_hug: :icon_hug:  :icon_flower:

Nichole







  •  

Kate

Quote from: Gracie FAISE on July 31, 2008, 09:29:42 PM
I dislike being considered as/grouped with non-transsexual transgendered people.
Basically: Cross dressers and ->-bleeped-<-s. I feel... demeaned or insulted when someone says "transgendered" when they mean "transsexualism." Now, I'm not saying I dislike them. I'm not stating any prejudices or trying to belittle them. I just don't like being told or described (whether directly, indirectly, knowingly, or unknowingly) as being on the same level as them.

For what it's worth...

When I was transitioning, I had to come out to probably 100 or so people over the course of the year (coworkers, neighbors, professional contacts, etc.). And out of all them, I can really only think of 2 people who had "the wrong idea," one of them assuming it meant I was doing drugs and having sex every night with random men, and the other thought it was an "alternative lifestyle" of crossdressing for kicks.

But 2 outa 100 isn't so bad. I don't much like people misunderstanding my motives either, but in *practical* terms it doesn't seem to be a problem... at least not with the general public.

~Kate~
  •  

Beyond

Quote from: Gracie FAISE on July 31, 2008, 09:29:42 PM
Okay so, I've been having a conflict in feelings lately. I've been having trouble sorting things out in my head, so if a few of my statements are contradictory, that is why. I don't know whether this belongs here or the edge too, so move it if necessary...


I dislike being considered as/grouped with non-transsexual transgendered people.
Basically: Cross dressers and ->-bleeped-<-s. I feel... demeaned or insulted when someone says "transgendered" when they mean "transsexualism." Now, I'm not saying I dislike them. I'm not stating any prejudices or trying to belittle them. I just don't like being told or described (whether directly, indirectly, knowingly, or unknowingly) as being on the same level as them.

I feel the same way and have been attacked at times for saying so.  They fail to see the point we're making... that we're different.  In fact ALL the groups under this d*mn umbrella have little or nothing to do with each other.  So you have to ask yourself who does this label (transgender) benefit?  Two groups that I can see:

1. The general public because they are too lazy to learn about different groups.  It soooo convenient to jump lump us all together for their convenience.

2. Crossdressers.  They feel a lot of shame about their status and grouping themselves with others legitimizes them, makes them feel better.  Let me finish before you jump on me.  Most of the laws that allow us to do legal name changes, gender marker changes and get new birth certificates pre-date the rise of the word "transgender".  We earned those basic rights back in the late 60's and early-mid 70's.  Legally we became legitimized and now crossdressers want that too.  The problem being the vast majority of crossdressers have a solid male gender identity.  In my mind they have no business being in a women's restroom ever.  Sorry, just being honest.  I have no problem with crossdressers, really, but I do have a problem with them claiming to be just like us.

------------------------------------------------------------


Alicia said we should be separate from the LGB folks.  Well there are 2 problems with that:

1. Many transsexual people are gay/lesbian or bi.

2. Although we are different we ALL suffer the same discrimination heaped on us by ignorant cisgender straight folks.


I think we need to stay together as the LGBT for important political purposes; greater numbers = more power (when we're not fighting each other).


------------------------------------------------


I think we have to reclaim the word "transsexual".  And educate people as to what that adjective means.  I know a lot of people are rolling their eyes right about now.  They hate the "sex" portion.  Well that's why we have to continue to educate folks!  And you are a transsexual person.... don't be shamed by ignorant people.  "Transsexual" is the correct term because we change our bodies sex.  We have to take ownership of this word if we are to succeed.


---------------------------------------------------------


The issue I don't have an answer for is the whole "gender identity" vs. "gender expression" in legislation.  On one hand I think only "gender identity" should be used.  However, that doesn't protect butch lesbians or effeminate gays.  They need "gender expression" included.  But how do we include "gender expression" without opening a can of worms with CD's (who vastly outnumber us) possibly causing havoc?  How do you write such legislation?  I think that's the biggest bottle neck right now.  Any California folks here?  How did they deal with it in their anti-discrimination law?  Fom what I can see from the other side of the country whatever you're doing out there it seems to be working.  Am I wrong?



Okay this post is long enough. Hopefully I don't get slammed to badly......
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Beyond on August 01, 2008, 03:34:13 PM
Most of the laws that allow us to do legal name changes, gender marker changes and get new birth certificates pre-date the rise of the word "transgender".  We earned those basic rights back in the late 60's and early-mid 70's.  Legally we became legitimized and now crossdressers want that too. 

First slam, Beyond!!  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Trouble is it's not going to be a slam.  :)  You are absolutely right about when those changes were made. And look at the political climate. Women getting certain legal protections, but not the ERA. Gays the same. People of color, Jews, the entire rainbow of civil rights and human rights movements were gaining a lot of momentum.

Anita Bryant became a laughing-stock, not simply to gay/lesbian/bi/trans people, but to a large segment of the population. There were Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress and Nixon was unable in large part to dismantle the Great Society. It was, despite higher & more non-social only church attendance , etc, a time when there was much more general concern about treating people right.

What's intervened is the "Reagan Revolution" & the rise and sway of the Moral Majority, Focus on the Family, Neo-Con/Irving Kristol, Limbaugh/O'Reilly/Hannity/Coulter groupies and just a more pervasive hesitation to go against that crew by legislatures everywhere.

I honestly think that had those rights not been granted at that time, and in some states they weren't, that getting them now would be extraordinarily more difficult in comparison to what was put in place then. And at that point where would we go, say in 1999?

But that's just this woman's opinion.

Nichole
  •  

Chrissty

Coming from the "TG side of the street" on this one (for the moment)....

I think that compared to the mammoth list of issues that need to be
fought for TS rights, the return for educating the world populous in
the difference between TS and TG is going to yield a poor return.

Let's face it most of the newspaper reading public are still being told
that transsexual is the same as drag, TV or CD, and they rarely use
the soft term "gender" as it simply doesn't sell papers. I don't think
the public is necessarily lazy; it just isn't high on their daily priority
list, to go and find out more.

In real terms the LGB community is rapidly gaining public acceptance
these days. Most people in the world will personally know at least
someone who is openly LGB, and they are learning to socially interact
with them as a person and not the label on a daily basis. The same
cannot be said for TS or TG, so in many respects we need to ride
the back of LGB public acceptance, so separation would be a
negative move at this time.

That said, I do understand why there may be an underlying concern,
and I respect those voicing it.  :icon_bunch:


Chrissty
  •  

Gracie Faise

Quote from: Chrissty on August 01, 2008, 05:24:12 PM
Coming from the "TG side of the street" on this one (for the moment)....

I think that compared to the mammoth list of issues that need to be
fought for TS rights, the return for educating the world populous in
the difference between TS and TG is going to yield a poor return.

Let's face it most of the newspaper reading public are still being told
that transsexual is the same as drag, TV or CD, and they rarely use
the soft term "gender" as it simply doesn't sell papers. I don't think
the public is necessarily lazy; it just isn't high on their daily priority
list, to go and find out more.

In real terms the LGB community is rapidly gaining public acceptance
these days. Most people in the world will personally know at least
someone who is openly LGB, and they are learning to socially interact
with them as a person and not the label on a daily basis. The same
cannot be said for TS or TG, so in many respects we need to ride
the back of LGB public acceptance, so separation would be a
negative move at this time.

That said, I do understand why there may be an underlying concern,
and I respect those voicing it.  :icon_bunch:


Chrissty

From what I know, Transsexualism is a physiological problem. It is completely medical. That, to me, is the separation, and a big one. Sometimes I feel that those with transsexualism don't need laws to protect their rights, they just need public verification that it is a birth defect, not a sexual deviance/mental illness/done for fun and trickery/any other number of reasons non-transsexual transgendered individuals are transgendered.

Posted on: August 01, 2008, 03:52:59 PM
Quote from: Beyond on August 01, 2008, 03:34:13 PM
  Any California folks here?  How did they deal with it in their anti-discrimination law?  Fom what I can see from the other side of the country whatever you're doing out there it seems to be working.  Am I wrong?

I don't think california as a whole protected gender expression in the discrimination act, but I think the san diego (where im from) and the san francisco city anti-discrimination laws protect it. But soft-discrimination is so easy to do and so hard to prove, so yeah.
  •  

joannatsf

The anti-discrimination law that protects California LGBT folk did not specifically include TG people.  The Courts, however, extended the law to include transgendered people.  ENDA is of no consequence to Cali queers!  ;D
  •  

Chrissty

#15
Quote from: Gracie FAISE on August 01, 2008, 05:59:54 PM
From what I know, Transsexualism is a physiological problem. It is completely medical. That, to me, is the separation, and a big one. Sometimes I feel that those with transsexualism don't need laws to protect their rights, they just need public verification that it is a birth defect, not a sexual deviance/mental illness/done for fun and trickery/any other number of reasons non-transsexual transgendered individuals are transgendered.[

...and I believe that public acceptance at "street" level is what will ultimatly result in what you seek, I did not mention laws here....

I guess under these guidelines, as I am not strictly TV, CD, or TS, and TG is too general.....so I better look to start up a new category for the older "with bits but on hold" ::)

Chrissty
  •  

tinkerbell

Quote from: Beyond on August 01, 2008, 03:34:13 PM
Am I wrong?

No!  actually I am with you 100%!

Quote from: Beyond on August 01, 2008, 03:34:13 PM
I feel the same way and have been attacked at times for saying so.  They fail to see the point we're making... that we're different.  In fact ALL the groups under this d*mn umbrella have little or nothing to do with each other.  So you have to ask yourself who does this label (transgender) benefit?  Two groups that I can see:

1. The general public because they are too lazy to learn about different groups.  It soooo convenient to jump lump us all together for their convenience.

2. Crossdressers.  They feel a lot of shame about their status and grouping themselves with others legitimizes them, makes them feel better.  Let me finish before you jump on me.  Most of the laws that allow us to do legal name changes, gender marker changes and get new birth certificates pre-date the rise of the word "transgender".  We earned those basic rights back in the late 60's and early-mid 70's.  Legally we became legitimized and now crossdressers want that too.  The problem being the vast majority of crossdressers have a solid male gender identity.  In my mind they have no business being in a women's restroom ever.  Sorry, just being honest.  I have no problem with crossdressers, really, but I do have a problem with them claiming to be just like us.

I concur totally.  Very well said.  Thank you Beyond!  :)

tink :icon_chick:
  •  

Wing Walker

Quote from: Gracie FAISE on July 31, 2008, 09:29:42 PM
Okay so, I've been having a conflict in feelings lately. I've been having trouble sorting things out in my head, so if a few of my statements are contradictory, that is why. I don't know whether this belongs here or the edge too, so move it if necessary...


I dislike being considered as/grouped with non-transsexual transgendered people.
Basically: Cross dressers and ->-bleeped-<-s. I feel... demeaned or insulted when someone says "transgendered" when they mean "transsexualism." Now, I'm not saying I dislike them. I'm not stating any prejudices or trying to belittle them. I just don't like being told or described (whether directly, indirectly, knowingly, or unknowingly) as being on the same level as them.

I just feel that, even though we have similar struggles, I'm just from a completely different universe with all of it. It's a physiological thing for me, and to be called the same thing as someone who gender bends for sexual/recreational purposes makes me feel misunderstood and anguished and even a little upset/angry.

But the thing is is it makes me feel terrible that I have such negative, perhaps even grudgingly negative feelings towards people that seem so nice and friendly at my support groups. Why? I'm upset with the people that tell me I'm the same, not non-transsexual transgendered people themselves!

I do hold some sympathetic feelings for HBS views, and agree with some of their less discriminatory policies and goals. I don't know if these feelings are just the beginnings of some very aggressive feelings that I see in a lot of people that consider themselves HBSers or if they're just isolated frustrations/confusions I need to work out.

Hi, Gracie, I fully agree with you.  I do not wish to be stuck under the transgender umbrella.  I am transsexual, M to F, a transsexual woman.  As CindyBC said, I am transsexual when relating to other transsexual persons, and always a women, regardless of where I am.
*******************


If I could hear others opinions about this maybe I could figure some stuff out about what I'm really feelings.
Quote from: Isabelle St-Pierre on July 31, 2008, 09:46:50 PM
Greetings,

Hum, I would have to admit that I too sometime have similar feelings on this topic. When ever I hear the argument when gender identity is added to some city's anti-discrimination law about...well...then that means any man in a dress can enter a womans bathroom! Oh give me a break already, they are lumping transsexuals in the cross-dresser category and simply have no idea what they are talking about; just drives me absolutely crazy...hum...did I miss my E shot this week???

One of the problems is the term transgender in and of itself. The term is an umbrella term, but people fail to recognize all of the categories that make up that umbrella and use the word in the wrong context. This is an education problem and one of the reason why the general public still needs to be educated about trans issues, what it means to be trans, etc. But at the same time, a lot of transsexuals went through a cross-dressing phase before realizing that things went much deeper then simply having a desire to dress as the opposite sex; so for some cross-dressers it is also a physiological thing too.

I don't think you are alone in your feelings...

The term, "transgender" was coined by a British male cross-dresser who called himself "Virginia Prince.  It was not conjured-up by a person who was transsexual.

I have seen one person who was a crossdresser become curious about truly being transsexual instead.  He was a member of the Cornbury Society, a crossdresser group named after Lord Cornbury, a colonial governor of New York who was also a crossdresser.

In talking with this person he told me that he was afraid to go beyond crossdressing because of what his family and the world at-large  would have to say about his need to change gender.  It seems that he was no longer able to hide his transsexuality and he came out to himself and is coming out to his family as well.

Very early in my transition I had the distinct discomfort of being invited to a meeting of the Trans Gender Education Association (TGEA).  Although I was warmly welcomed by persons dressed as women, I was quite ill-at-ease when I heard their voices.  They were men!  Then I saw a few men enter the meeting-place and head for the women's washroom where they changed into their feminine garb and makeup.

I was glad to leave there.   

If the "trans umbrella" closed-up and kept CDs under it, I am sure that we who are transsexual would devise another way to stay out of the rain.

Wing Walker

Edited to remove group slur. -- Nichole
  •  

NicholeW.

Having reworked this and posted it elsewhere on the web I have removed it from this thread because to leave it would violate the site terms of service.


Nichole

  •  

NicholeW.


A visceral hatred expressed tends to lead to only hatred. I personally know more than a few TSes, classic ones, "who sound like men."

But here's the fact. Visceral hatred is exactly what killed Angie Zapata. That it is used by sisters just appalls me.

N~
  •