Quote from: iFindMeHere on October 29, 2008, 09:39:35 AM
Quote from: Princess Katrina on October 29, 2008, 02:16:38 AM
Quote from: iFindMeHere on October 29, 2008, 01:43:54 AM
Quote from: Princess Katrina on October 29, 2008, 01:36:28 AM
Quote from: iFindMeHere on October 29, 2008, 01:01:14 AM
Not everywhere. Thailand has Kathoey, Fa'fatime in Samoa, those are just two examples where it's more or less normal.
I would guess, from what you said, that you're referring to other languages? Otherwise, I have no clue what you mean.
Kathoey are considered, in their own language, to be either a third gender or "another kind of woman". Some do HRT and the like.
Fa'fatime are similar but no hrt
Then that sounds more like words for "transwomen" or "eunuchs" than using "sex" and "gender" to refer to the difference between psychological gender and physical gender.
Very much no. Did you read what i said? You see, they're from totally different cultures and like i said they're not so "shocking" there (why do you think Thailand is one of the places so many go?). How do you think things got so advanced there? Because it's not "shocking" or "sick" to the larger culture.
Cultural commentary aside, you are completely and entirely missing the point of discussion here.
A term for another gender besides male and female is no different than the term "transgender" or "transsexual." Eunuchs are also at times looked at as being a "third" type of gender, being considered neither male nor female.
However, that is NOT the terminology in question here. The terms being discussed are the words "sex" and "gender" and what they mean.
Look up "sex" and "gender" in the dictionary. The definition of Gender is Sex. The two terms are synonymous. The
connotation that "sex" specifically refers to physical status and "gender" specifically refers to mental identity is something we in the transgender community have made up in order to try and explain what we are to others.
However, it would be
far more appropriate to just use the terms "physical gender" and "gender identity" to distinguish between those two very aspects, and stick with the term "transgender."
Anyone who says "I did not change my gender; I changed my sex" is contradicting themselves, unless they choose to use the romance novel definition of sex in which case it would specifically mean "genitalia," but that's still using the connotative definitions of what is effectively a subculture.
I'm sorry, but it really does not matter how you
prefer to say things, from a purely linguistic standpoint, trans
gender is more accurate than trans
sexual. On top of that, there's the ability to avoid
other people's negative connotations by eliminating the word "sex" from the whole situation.
Hell, if anything, transsexual would be a logical term for a "->-bleeped-<- ->-bleeped-<-," though at this point in time it would be rather complicated to try and shift the usages of words to reflect that.
QuoteIt sounds like you're positioning the idea of "sex" and "sexuality" as kind of shameful
I don't consider sex or sexuality to be at all shameful. Quite the contrary. However, being a transwoman or a transman has absolutely nothing to do with sexuality beyond dictating how your sexual orientation is labelled, and that doesn't even really have to do with being a transwoman or transman. It just has to do with whether you have a male gender identity or a female gender identity. We don't transition for sexual reasons (though I won't deny that I have no interest in having sex as a male).
The issue is merely that there are massive negative connotations with sexuality, especially any kind of possibly "abnormal" sexuality, among the general populace. Keeping ourselves distinct and separate would do a lot to help curb negative stereotyping of our community. Just the fact that people say "Transsexual" to refer to us tends to bring a negative image to mind upon first hearing it. I know it did for me when I first heard the term years ago, before I ever learned what that really is, and I've always been rather open sexually.