Quote from: tekla on June 24, 2011, 12:10:45 PM
So. Let me get this right. You, and your fellow Xians get to write whatever you want about all of this, and people who don't agree with you should not say anything because it could be upsetting to many of those who believe many of which seem to be on a rather slender thread to begin with.
Slamming Christianity isn't important enough to remove the only hope some may have.
Here's the deal. I don't think it's hopeless. I think that for those people in that situation good psychological care and a solid medical diagnosis and treatment offer much better odds of success. And I don't think anything anyone writes on the web, or in science, or says in any way changes the way anyone feels about god. That belief is something that an individual can only do themselves.
First off, I don't think Del advocated being able to say anything without reproach. I read an impassioned and well-written plea against baselessy denigrating a spiritual path that may provide a great deal of fulfillment and meaning to those who believe. There are people who profess to be on that path who use that path to attack others, going against the very teachings of Jesus. Granted, the message is as open to personal interpretation as is any other message, but the fact remains that they give decent followers a bad name by association. That there
are decent followers who are willing to stand up and denounce these charlatans speaks volumes about their characters, and I think Del did just that.
Now as for your second comment, it's spot on: spiritual views are highly personal and not generally open to change by external force. But the fact is, some bold pioneers in modern psychology have begun to study spirituality and belief as part of mainstream research, something that used to result in expulsion from the field. It's starting to gain traction as well. The February (I think it was February) issue of Monitor on Psychology, the official magazine of the APA, devoted half the issue to the role of spirituality in life. What's being found is that those who have some form of belief, regardless of what that belief is, are generally in better health, better spirits, and have faster recovery times after surgery (among others). So why disturb their peace by belligerently attacking something that is now being shown to have medically proven benefits? That's what Del was on to: why attack them for their belief when it can help in immeasurable ways?
And it goes beyond Christianity... why attack
anyone for their beliefs so long as they aren't harming others? And especially if their beliefs mean so much to them.